Editor: Below is a text disputing the narrative that Kary Mullis is a hero. The author seems to be an obscure person unwilling to put their face to their articles and instead publish through a google dropsite. Kary Mullis exposed some of the lies during the HIV-AIDS hoax whereby the Centre For Disease Control sought to make billions off the cell terminator drug AZT – which had been deemed too dangerous to treat cancer patients – it is unlikely he was a “good guy”.
Kary Mullis’s Nobel Prize perhaps speaks volumes to what the permanent State think of him. Given everyone who receives one is a complete rotter.
However I still believe he was murdered in 2019 to ensure he had a complete Omerta on his ability to criticise the PCR tests that he supposedly invented. Overall this article provides interesting context into how US imperialism operates with it’s voluminous mountains of pseudo-science to enslave the world.
HERO BUSTING – KARY MULLIS EDITION
by Omar Jordan (9/11/2023)
Introduction: A Sad State of Affairs
Well, it’s a sad state of affairs in Trutherdom that I even have to take time out of my day to write this paper. Unfortunately, it seems like many of these so-called truthers are still clinging to the illusion that somehow Kary Mullis was a genuine scientist who helped dispel the lies around HIV/AIDS and actually “invented” PCR. One would think that the mere fact that he is a Nobel Prize winner should be enough to discard him as one of the elite, or at least working for them. I guess not.
Now it is true that Mullis did dispel some of the lies around HIV/AIDS, but only in the context of pretending that HIV existed in the first place, so that’s another obvious major red flag. The Mullis character isn’t a real opposition character because he is in agreement with the mainstream’s position which is that HIV is real and exists, even though nobody has ever proven that it exists as mainstream science has defined it.
So Mullis actually helps to strengthen the big lie in this regard. This alone should also be enough to discard Mullis, but unfortunately, mass Trutherdom always wants to give these characters the benefit of the doubt at least, or exalt them to god-like status at worst.
That’s not hyperbole, that is precisely what they’ve done with Mullis.
The “God-Like” Persona
Mullis is indeed a God-like figure among the fake/misguided truther community who seem to love his free-thinking, wine-drinking, guitar playing, acid-tripping “rebellious” womanizer persona. As they should, since that celebrity persona was created specifically for them to latch onto and adore.
That’s why we have to constantly lay it all out on the table and spell it out for them, which is so exhausting. But, let’s do that.
The PCR Narrative and Its Deceptions
For starters, let’s remember that Mullis helped to create the narrative that by “over cycling” the amplification process of PCR, you could “find anything.” Here’s the exact quote from 1997:
“Anyone can test positive for practically anything with a PCR test, if you run it long enough with PCR if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.”
As you may remember, this narrative was recycled during the early stages of the COVID PsyOp by many of the deceivers who wanted to tell us that PCR could find the DNA sequences that “prove” someone is infected with “SARS-COV-2” – by “running too many cycles.” They tried to create a bait and switch about an illusion that was conducted through misuse of PCR, thereby legitimizing PCR technology, if used correctly.
This entire narrative is one of smoke and mirrors. It’s a deception that is meant to legitimize PCR generally. It is meant to create a limited hangout, fake narrative that the fraud was conducted by running too many cycles, rather than expose the entire lie.
In reality it doesn’t matter how many or how few cycles you run because the entire concept of the PCR test is a fraudulent one.
We know it’s fraudulent because we know there is no such thing as a “DNA molecule” as they’ve defined it, because no human being on the planet has ever observed one and all of their microscopic images are created by computer algorithms. That’s it. That is literally how simple it is to understand the lie of PCR and therefore the liar that is Kary Mullis. This lie about amplification cycles serves to reinforce not just the deception of virology but also the deception of DNA.
Mullis and the Nobel Prize
Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 “for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.” (Source)
As we’ll learn quickly, that’s mostly a lie, since Mullis had no actual involvement in the invention itself other than allegedly coming up with the “idea” and scratching out a rudimentary drawing of the idea on a piece of paper, while under the influence of LSD.
But the elite had to award someone, so they created Mullis and gave him the award for something fictional that they likely created themselves. PCR was absolutely a necessary and ground-breaking “invention” for what was subsequently to follow, not only around HIV, but all the way up to today’s COVID crimes. The entire basis of these crimes rests on PCR, so one could say Mullis himself is directly responsible for these crimes – that is, if he actually invented PCR. But he didn’t invent anything real, in terms of a valid scientific process.
So when they say that Mullis invented PCR, it’s not entirely a lie. He did invent it – not in a lab, but out of thin air, that is. Or, more aptly put, someone else or a group of people invented it behind the scenes and used Mullis to sell the story.
Mullis as a Front-Man
In order for the official story to make sense, one would have to buy into the idea that Mullis is a real scientist who invented PCR. The evidence, however, points to a more likely scenario of Mullis as an actor or “front-man” – a face to sell the PCR story to the public. Similar to an Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg type, but on a smaller scale.
In reality, the perps probably realized that they needed some sort of “method” or “explanation” as to how these things could be explained scientifically, at the (theoretical) molecular level, for their upcoming criminal PsyOps, whether actually scientifically sound or not.
Since we already understand that PCR is 100% fraudulent, we can surmise that whoever is behind that fraud must have also needed to create a story of its “invention” and sell it to the masses. So, PCR was necessary in that regard and what better way to implant the idea in the minds of the masses than to give it to an eccentric scientist with a sexy story who would go on to win the Nobel Prize for it and grace magazine covers worldwide?
Oh and he also loved surfing, played in a rock-and-roll band and liked to consume LSD. That should be enough to gain him “celebrity” cred for the counterculture truther types to latch onto and for mainstreamers to dismiss. Like that time Bill Clinton played saxophone on the Arsenio Hall show.
According to nobelprize.org:
An organism’s genome is stored inside DNA molecules, but analyzing this genetic information requires quite a large amount of DNA. In 1985, Kary Mullis invented the process known as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), in which a small amount of DNA can be copied in large quantities over a short period of time. By applying heat, the DNA molecule’s two strands are separated and the DNA building blocks that have been added are bonded to each strand. With the help of the enzyme DNA polymerase, new DNA chains are formed and the process can then be repeated. PCR has been of major importance in both medical research and forensic science.
That’s funny, isn’t it? These folks are actually attempting to claim that they can observe a DNA molecule and also observe its strands separate, just by applying some heat.
This is an obvious lie, of course, since nobody in the world has ever observed such a thing.
This is the purpose of the Mullis operation. It’s designed to sell the lie of DNA and the entire PCR fraud could then be used later to help sell the lies of virology.
Constructing the Celebrity Persona
It was 1983 and researchers in northern California were on to something – an idea conceived by this man, Kary Mullis, a scientist and surfer, who admittedly dabbled in psychedelic drugs. Mullis, who passed away in August, shared his idea with his employer at the time, Cetus Corporation. (Source)
When you read these types of mainstream articles, you’ll always note that they usually employ that same tactic, where they drop the little bit in there about how he dabbled in psychedelic drugs (or played in a rock band, or liked to drink wine).
Regardless of whether or not it’s true, that part is important for them to reveal in their storytelling because it helps construct the image of Mullis that they want to portray to the public. They understand that the counterculture rebel types will enjoy that little bit about Mullis and he’ll instantly become likable and relatable among that “cool” crowd.
At the same time, that little nugget helps to discredit Mullis in the eyes of normal folks like my dad. They’ll just write Mullis off as a crazy hippie who liked to surf and eat acid, not a real scientist who should be taken seriously. So when the fake smear campaigns follow, they’ll easily dismiss Mullis and his claims about PCR, HIV or whatever else. These 2 birds with one stone strategies are ubiquitous in these types of operations. You’ll find them employed everywhere.
Mullis’s Death and Disappearance
I won’t waste time speculating about whether or not Mullis actually did die, or if he perhaps faked his death. I have no way of knowing, but it is a little convenient in terms of the timing and the fact that he allegedly died of pneumonia. Perhaps he really did die, or perhaps his existence would be a bit too inconvenient for the COVID PsyOp, so he was written out of the script, given a pile of cash and quietly disappeared into retirement. There’s no way to know, so there’s no need to speculate further.
Mullis’s Bizarre Public Appearances
The Mullis character’s personality is deliberately an odd one as you can see if you watch his TED Talk,
where he decides he won’t talk about PCR because it’s “too complicated” and instead chooses to tell an erratic, incoherent story about building rockets as a 13 year old, complete with infinite tangents and half complete sentences. He comes across as a mad scientist, twitching and mumbling throughout the entire talk. Naturally, most norms wouldn’t even be able to get through 20 minutes of these inane ramblings and cast Mullis (and his fake opposition claims) aside immediately.
Then watch this Google Fireside chat from 12 years ago, where he tells the exact same boring story, complete with broken thoughts and constant twitching. He also talks about the “future of immunity,” “antibiotic resistance,” “viruses” and a plethora of other pseudoscientific concepts.
The Real Inventor of PCR
Again, as admitted in even the mainstream articles, PCR was just an alleged “idea” that Mullis had … the actual in-lab work was conducted by a team of technicians that didn’t include Mullis. That team was headed by Dr. Henry Erlich. So why does the Nobel Prize website still credit Mullis as the “inventor” – is it just because he originally had the idea? How could anyone prove that the idea was originally his, anyways?
Google defines inventor, as:
a person who invents, especially one who devises some new process, appliance, machine, or article; one who makes inventions.
But Mullis didn’t do any of that at all. He wasn’t involved in devising a new process, appliance, machine, etc. All he did was allegedly “have an idea” one night while driving and half-tripping on acid. What a rebel.
At best, we have some stories of him allegedly conducting some half-assed solo experiments in a lab at Cetus, but no real evidence of that work.
Furthermore, his idea wasn’t an original one either, it was specifically an idea on how to improve previous processes. But the main point here is that Mullis wasn’t involved in any inventing, lab-work or on-the-ground processes at all.
Since the early 1980s, Henry A. Erlich has been well-known in the forensic and medical communities for helping to pioneer the research and development of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique that ultimately led to a number of important forensic and clinical applications. As a result of the pioneering efforts of Erlich and his team of scientists, the first commercial PCR typing kit was developed specifically for forensic use. Currently, Erlich is the director of the Department of Human Genetics and vice-president of Discovery Research, both for Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; and the co-director (and co-founder) of the HLA Laboratory at the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute—all three located in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. (Source)
Now that we have a basic understanding of who actually invented PCR, have a look at what Mullis wrote.
The Mythical Origin Story
In true storytelling fashion, Mullis talks about how he “stumbled on PCR in the spring of 1983” on a late night California drive through the mountains. He says he was “functionally sober” and then goes on to tell a mystical tale about the ride, the road and the circumstances around his “stumbling” on PCR. Notice that Mullis makes a point to say that he was “functionally sober” which is a very different thing than actually sober, of course.
Mullis paints a picture of his journey, using phrases such as “my lab” or “I started devising methods,” adding dramatic flare to make the whole thing feel more real.
It was going to happen tonight. That somebody was going to be me. In ten years I would be toasting the health of the Swedish Royals in Stockholm, grinning from ear to ear at my good fortune…
The California buckeyes poked heavy blossoms out into Highway 128. The pink and white stalks hanging down into my headlights looked cold, but they were loaded with warmed oils that dominated the dimension of smell. It seemed to be the night of the buckeyes, but something else was stirring.
My little silver Honda’s front tires pulled us through the mountains. My hands felt the road and the turns. My mind drifted back into the laboratory. DNA chains coiled and floated. Lurid blue and pink images of electric molecules injected themselves somewhere between the mountain road and my eyes.
Mullis does have a penchant for storytelling, for sure. I’ll give him that.
What’s important to understand when you read his story, is the reason why this story exists in the first place. It exists to help solidify the fiction of DNA. The story is not just that DNA is real, but Mullis and his colleagues can not only observe it, they can also clone it!
So when Mullis mentions about how his mind “drifted back into the laboratory,” readers should think critically about his claims.
Staged Photos and Fake Labs
Which laboratory? Is there any proof at all that Mullis has ever even stepped foot in a real laboratory? That he ran one and performed experiments in one? Any photos of Mullis in the lab?
When I say photos, I mean real ones. Not staged photo-ops of Mullis in a sound studio, like this one, complete with ridiculous half-filled beakers and test tubes, like he’s actually supposed to be performing an experiment here? Why stage photographs of a real scientist in a fake lab? Why not just go to his real lab and take some real photographs? You know, ones that don’t require filling beakers with apple juice against a dark, foggy background. Honestly, I have doubts he was a real surfer either. A few photos of him carrying a surfboard certainly isn’t convincing enough for me.
Well, perhaps Mullis is referring to the Cetus laboratory, where he (allegedly) worked?
Let’s listen to Mullis explain about his Eureka moment.
Mullis says he “ran a lab” at Cetus and had 7 people working for him. Okay, maybe that’s true on paper, but what did he actually do? Anything tangible? Mullis wrote:
First I would denature my sample, separated into four tubes, add the primers I would later use in the main event, bring to 37 degrees and wait. The polymerase should polymerise all the nucleotides. Now I would heat the mixture to remove the oligos that may have been extended indefinitely now, cool to 37 degrees, add some more polymerase which would have been denatured by the heat, and add the dideoxynucleotides.
Did Mullis actually do any of these things? As we’ll come to learn, the answer is a verifiable “No.” Mullis was not involved in the lab work, the invention itself or any of the technical details whatsoever, but he writes as if he was involved in the process of confirming PCR.
So, he essentially took credit for the invention, even though he had no part in it whatsoever, except for “allegedly” coming up with the idea.
Mullis and Cetus: The Biotech Connection
Remember now, Mullis attended the spooky University at Berkeley before he started working for Cetus (with a stint working at a prestigious bakery in between).
Cetus was one of, if not THE first biotechnology companies, originally established in Berkeley, in 1971. In 1991, they merged with Chiron Corporation which is now a part of Novartis.
Novartis is one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world and was the fourth largest by revenue in 2022.
Funny how that all falls out, isn’t it?
In other words, if Mullis really did do these things, then his invention eventually led to huge profits by biotech and vaccine manufacturing companies. Remember, the entire concept of confirming modern day viral illnesses, the drugs used to treat them, and the vaccines that allegedly protect you from them, stems entirely from PCR, which is the process that is used to confirm the “infections”, the existence of the viruses and the subsequent profits that result from the entire testing and treatment process.
To say it yet another way, if Mullis did indeed invent PCR, one might say he is directly responsible for all the wrath, suffering and havoc that has resulted from it.
According to Wikipedia, Cetus is best known for developing “several significant pharmaceutical drugs as well as a revolutionary DNA amplification technique.”
That DNA amplification technique they mention is of course, Mullis’s fraudulent PCR. We know it’s fraudulent because PCR doesn’t directly amplify anything. The mere suggestion that anyone in the world can detect and then “amplify” DNA, is nonsense and patently absurd.
So if PCR itself is fraudulent and doesn’t do what it claims to do, then that must also mean that Mullis himself is a fraud. I could end the paper here, it’s that simple. But let’s dig a little further.
Donald Glaser and the Red Flags
Cetus was co-founded by Donald Glaser who was (allegedly) “an American physicist, neurobiologist, and the winner of the 1960 Nobel Prize in Physics for his invention of the bubble chamber used in subatomic particle physics.”
You can read more about Glaser in his bio here as well as this 151 page interview here. This will help you connect some dots. We also learn from his WikiPedia page that Glaser made an inexplicable career transition from physics to molecular biology.
You’ll often find these bizarre career transitions in these PsyOps. I consider them a red flag.
They set this story up earlier in his career:
[2]: 22 While at Caltech he learned to design and build the equipment he needed for his experiments, and this skill would prove to be useful throughout his career. He also attended molecular genetics seminars led by Nobel laureate Max Delbrück; [2]: 20 he would return to this field later.
Who is Max Delbrück?
…German–American biophysicist who participated in launching the molecular biology research program in the late 1930s. He stimulated physical scientists’ interest into biology, especially as to basic research to physically explain genes, mysterious at the time. Formed in 1945 and led by Delbrück along with Salvador Luria and Alfred Hershey, the Phage Group made substantial headway unraveling important aspects of genetics. The three shared the 1969 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine “for their discoveries concerning the replication mechanism and the genetic structure of viruses.” [5] He was the first physicist to predict what is now called Delbrück scattering.
If you really want to understand the foundation of all of this and how it leads up to Mullis, then read this book – 50 Years of DNA.
Back to Glaser…
He spent a semester at MIT as a visiting professor and attended biology seminars there, and also spent a semester at Copenhagen with Ole Maaloe, the prominent Danish molecular biologist.
So there you have it, he spent a semester here, a semester there, took a few seminars and voila, he’s now a molecular biologist. I guess it’s not that hard when you’re jumping from one pseudoscience to another.
So, here we have another fake particle chaser turned molecular biologist, behind the company that Mullis allegedly worked at, another red flag.
The Deeper Rabbit Hole
You might be wondering if or why any of this is really significant. I would suggest that it is very much so. You have to go back and tie these folks together and examine the circumstances around which the seeds of their lies were planted. For example:
MAX DELBRÜCK (1906–1981) played a crucial role in getting molecular biology as we know it on its successful way. Thus, in the 1940s, after emigrating to the United States, he started a new science. However, he had begun in the oldest science as a student of astronomy in the 1920s while still in his native country, Germany. He soon left this field since it was during those student years that the lasting revolutionary science of quantum mechanics made its debut. Thus, Max eagerly switched to theoretical physics in which he obtained his Ph.D. in 1929. From then on he tried to find out if the new understanding of the stability of atoms and the properties of matter could help in explaining the nature of genes…
In the years during the Second World War Max discovered—with a little help from a lot of friends—how to do genetics with bacteria and their viruses (bacteriophages). After 1945 he helped to spread the news by setting up phage courses, still running today, at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, New York (see SUSMAN 1995). These activities were instrumental in creating the molecular biology that exploded in the years following the Second World War (STENT and WATSON 1966).
When the new science of life reached its first epochal breakthrough with the discovery of the structure of DNA in 1953, Max was Professor of Biology at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. At that time, he left genetics and turned to the analysis of sensory behavior that he pursued till the end of his life. (Source)
Read the whole thing. When you’re done with that, read this one.
If you want to go down another relevant rabbit hole, read about Cold Spring Harbor and here.
Quickly, you will come to understand the history of these folks and their operations.
In 1935, Delbrück published a collaboration with Nikolay Timofeev-Ressovsky and Karl Zimmer the major work, Über die Natur der Genmutation und der Genstruktur. It was considered to be a major [13] advance in understanding the nature of gene mutation and gene structure. The work was a keystone in the formation of molecular genetics.
In 1937, he attained a fellowship from Rockefeller Foundation—which was launching the molecular biology research program—to research genetics of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, in [16] California Institute of Technology’s biology department, where Delbrück could blend interests in biochemistry and genetics.
Just like Mullis!
While at Caltech, Delbrück researched bacteria and their viruses (bacteriophages or phages). In [18][19] 1939, with Emory L. Ellis, he co authored “The growth of bacteriophage”, a paper reporting that the viruses reproduce in one step, not exponentially as do cellular organisms.
In addition to the Nobel Prize, Delbrück was elected a Foreign Member of the Royal Society (ForMemRS) in 1967.
Read his entire Wikipedia page, and do the same for Glaser. This is important so that you have the context behind the person who co-founded the company Mullis allegedly worked for, the “sciences” they were involved with and their Nobel fraternity circles.
Mullis’s Early Career: A Story of Unearned Success
Mullis was notorious at Berkeley for his irreverent approach to science and his skill in synthesizing psychedelic drugs. His curiosity ranged far beyond chemistry. At 22, he sent off an article to the prestigious journal Nature describing, in his words, “the entire universe from beginning to end.”
“I had read a lot about astrophysics and had taken some psychoactive drugs, which enhanced my perceived understanding of the cosmos,” Mullis recalled in his memoir, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field. The article was entitled “The Cosmological Significance of Time Reversal.” Incredibly, Nature published it.
Of course they did.
When the time came for his oral exams, Mullis was unprepared. White recalls, “He didn’t get his propositions right. He didn’t know general biochemistry.” Mullis himself believed that it was the Nature article that greased the wheels with the committee. Similarly, his thesis was so eccentric that the dissertation committee initially refused to sign off on it. According to White, several of his close friends edited his drafts in an attempt to “cut all the whacko stuff out of it.” Still, the final version retained its peculiarity.
It’s a wonder he ever graduated or was even accepted to these universities in the first place. What do you suppose would happen if YOU did that in college?
“The deep mysteries of the cosmos are at last within our grasp,” Mullis wrote in the conclusion. “The question we must ask ourselves is whether or not we should go further. Perhaps there are organisms with other iron binding agents on other planets. Nuclear magnetic resonance is waiting. Will they escape the prying fingers and prurient eyes of the two-legged mammal?”
Mullis sounds more like an adept storyteller, perhaps a Pulitzer prize winning fictional author type to me. But hey, when you’re dealing with pseudoscientific subjects like virology, particle chasing, nuclear this or that and astrophysics, sometimes it’s these thespian types that are best suited and qualified for the job. Mullis fits that persona perfectly. Then, when we learn that he actually wrote fiction briefly before accepting a fellowship at University of Kansas, it makes even more sense.
After graduating, Mullis moved to Kansas with wife number two, divorced, met future wife number three, then returned to Berkeley. While managing a café owned by his first wife, he bumped into his old friend Tom White, now a postdoc at UCSF Medical Center. White got Mullis a lab job at UCSF. Soon after, White was hired as a research scientist at Cetus Corp. And once again he went to bat for Mullis.
“I said, if you hire this guy Mullis, he’s an excellent synthetic chemist,” White says. “I knew he was a good chemist because he’d been synthesizing hallucinogenic drugs at Berkeley.”
“Despite knowing little about molecular biology, Mullis was hired to work in the company’s DNA synthesis lab where he was tasked with streamlining the production of oligonucleotides, little molecules used to isolate sections of natural DNA for study. Thanks to his ingenuity, oligonucleotide production boomed. When White was promoted to director of molecular and biological research, he made Mullis head of the DNA synthesis lab.” (Source)
What? Why would they do that? Why would they hire a guy who doesn’t know much about molecular biology to work in the “DNA synthesis lab” AND promote him to director of that lab? What precisely did Mullis do at this lab and is there any actual evidence of him doing those things?
He wasn’t qualified for that job in the slightest, he was a known eccentric psychedelic drug user who was working in a bakery owned by his first wife. So why did they hire him? Apparently we are just supposed to believe this story that he was a brilliant mind who came up with this idea. An idea that just so conveniently happens to perfectly align with the profit goals and objectives of his employers, of course.
Mullis’s “Epiphany” and His Lack of Lab Skills
Fittingly, Mullis’s epiphany came in his car, while driving through the hills of Mendocino County. He reasoned that by attaching two oligonucleotides to a split strand of DNA, he could isolate a desired section, such as the segment of DNA that determines sickle cell anemia. By adding polymerase, a natural enzyme required for DNA replication, he could create two identical copies of the fragment. His next thought hit him like a revelation: If he simply repeated this process, each repetition would double the target fragment, creating an exponential explosion of the target DNA, and weeding out the unwanted segments. In essence, Cetus scientists would now have a traffic jam to examine through their telescope. And crucially, every car would have the same license plate.
How convenient.
“He really didn’t know much of anything about molecular biology,” White says. “And so when he tried to tell all the molecular biologists that this was a good idea, most of them were very skeptical…”
To Mullis the skepticism was an affront. After a number of failed experiments, he got results that he believed suggested PCR worked. But Mullis had never been a thorough experimentalist, and these attempts to prove his concept lacked appropriate controls and repetition. The skeptics remained skeptical.
So, even the mainstream story lets us know that Mullis wasn’t actually a legitimate scientist who produced real results in a lab.
Over the next several months, while Mullis continued to produce ambiguous results, the second group led by Henry Erlich and Norman Arnheim hit the jackpot. Mullis had been right all along. PCR worked.
The technique was a scientific turning point. Within just a few years, use of PCR exploded, fueling the expansion of the biotech industry. Berkeley professor of molecular and cell biology David Bilder, says, “PCR revolutionized everything. It really superpowered molecular biology—which then transformed other fields, even distant ones like ecology and evolution. … It’s impossible to overstate PCR’s impact. The ability to generate as much DNA of a specific sequence as you want, starting from a few simple chemicals and some temperature changes—it’s just magical.”
…and there you have it. Magical, indeed. “Fueling expansion of the biotech industry” and further solidifying the fraud of DNA is what this was all about.
Pay close attention to what these folks are claiming. They are claiming that a few simple chemical processes and some heating of a sample can “generate as much DNA of a specific sequence as you want.”
Pseudoscientific nonsense.
The Smithsonian Drawing
Here’s a drawing that Mullis inked in an interview in 1992 which is on display at the Smithsonian Institute.
Description (Brief):
Kary Mullis drew this diagram of the polymerase chain reaction process during an interview for a video history conducted on May 15, 1992, by former National Museum of American History curator Ray Kondratas. The video history is available at the Smithsonian Archives under record number SIA RU009577. Mullis invented the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 1983 as a method to copy specific portions of DNA. He won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his invention.
The drawing’s purple and red horizontal lines represent strands of DNA being copied. The letters “dNTPs” at the top of the page refer to deoxyribonucleotides, the individual units of DNA that are assembled into the longer continuous chain. A supply of dNTPs (which come in four types: dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP) are necessary for PCR to occur.
Ummm, okay. That drawing is supposed to convince us of Mullis’s genius. Really.
Of course, PCR would also eventually be used to hoodwink the entire planet as part of the bombastic COVID PsyOp, as well. One could even say that without PCR, the entire fraud of modern “pandemics” could never have gotten off the ground. In other words, Mullis is the best thing that ever happened to the folks who plan these psychological operation scams.
The Troublemaker Persona
If Mullis indeed was making such a difference “working in the lab” – then why was he not part of the team that actually created the PCR process in-lab, and why is there no evidence of his work there? Oh, they have a story for that, too…
He fought with his bosses. He fought with his coworkers. He fought with Cetus security guards and receptionists. Though married, he dated his labmates—and fought with them, too. Behind Mullis’s bellicosity seemed to be an abiding certainty that he was brilliant and everyone else was a fool, hell-bent on undermining his work. Cetus management was left wondering: What do we do with this guy?
Well, normally you fire a guy like that. Not promote him. We also have more eccentric stories about his drug-fueled, erratic behavior at Cetus including the one time he threatened to bring a gun to work. In his autobiography, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field, Mullis chronicles his use of LSD, belief in astrology and the paranormal, including the time he tried to have a cocktail with his dead grandfather’s ghost, and his encounter with an extraterrestrial glowing green raccoon riding a neon motorcycle which then morphed into a singing dolphin. No, really – he wrote about all of these things.
Is there a better way to discredit legitimate opposition ideas than by indirectly attaching them to a guy like Mullis?
Lack of Scientific Papers
Go see if you can find specific scientific papers detailing his research. You might find his name on a few papers like this one, or this one, or this other one, but I’m talking about something substantial that discusses his actual research in detail.
Most of what you’ll find is a few paragraphs of recycled explanations of how the PCR process works in abstract and general terms. You’ll notice that they’re all nearly identical and only discuss how it came to be developed in a lab, credited to other scientists, with no direct contribution from Mullis whatsoever, other than the idea that popped into his mind one night. Easy to fabricate, impossible to debunk.
In legitimate scientific articles, you will normally find many pages of detailed explanations and step-by-step analysis of the process which outlines the methodology and results of the experiments that were conducted.
But with Mullis, all we usually get are wild stories. Tall tales about his various rebellious exploits and eccentricism.
Read through the papers. You’ll find a few paragraphs of fluff, but no real meat and potatoes.
The Magical Thinking
Next, you can read this:
“With PCR 30 years later,” continues Doyle, “you could actually manipulate this DNA. The chain reaction itself then causes a chain reaction. You get the whole ‘Boom!’ effect. Four molecular biologists and a computer can start a company. You get massive shifts in drug design and Big Pharma—all because you can directly extract genetic information and manipulate it, which is ordinarily the job of evolution through organisms.”
Nonsense! PCR does not amplify or detect anything directly at all! There is simply no satisfactory, detailed explanation of how these alleged and theoretical “particles” are seen, separated, combined, cloned, replicated or anything else that’s observable.
In layman’s terms – they’re bullshitters.
Watch this 18 minute interview with Mullis.
The HIV/AIDS Controlled Opposition
Like the rest of the half-truther agents, Mullis takes the soft approach that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS.
Well of course HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, because there is no such thing as HIV, so therefore it couldn’t have caused AIDS. But Mullis doesn’t explain this in detail, even though he understands it. He won’t embrace the full truth, because it’s his job to not embrace it. His job is to protect the big lie.
In doing that job, Mullis helped to create a false narrative and the fake opposition around HIV – the “limit” of the opposition voice or the manufactured “boundary” so to speak. Which is the BLASPHEMOUS SUGGESTION that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS. And then that position could easily be ridiculed and painted as a cartoon with Mullis as the crazy scientist who could be the face of it (along with other characters like Duesberg).
Meaning that any suggestion that HIV doesn’t exist at all would be considered even FAR MORE extreme than this and dismissed altogether…and what better way to smear that position than by giving the false opposition an eccentric character like Mullis?
When this strategy was deployed, it buried the legitimate researchers and replaced them with cartoon characters like Mullis and Duesberg. The Perth Group is the best example of this – it was the Perth Group who was on the cutting edge of the research around HIV and it was their research that proved without any shadow of a doubt that there was no such thing as HIV. Most truthers likely have never heard of the Perth Group. But they’ve definitely heard of Mullis.
Remember that despite his fake anti-establishment rhetoric, his entire career was spent serving the medical/pharma industry and fully participating in the development of concepts and technologies that greatly enhanced the power of Big Pharma over the health and well being of humanity.
Mullis ain’t no rebel. He’s a SOLDIER FOR BIG PHARMA.
Mullis’s Germ Theory Promotion
“Ten years have passed and we’ve been waiting for someone to distinguish himself (by proving that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS) and get a life long grant from Tony Fauci but he hasn’t shown up.”
“The chances of you getting a human virus are a hell of a lot higher than they were say 10,000 years ago. There are an infinite number of retro viruses in the world because they are changing so fast you can’t even count them. As there are more and more people in your life, you get more and more chances of getting retro viruses’
The chances are good that they are harmless because they are barely alive but if you hang out with a thousand people here that allow you to get some or most of their retro viruses and then hang out with a thousand people a year and they hang out with a thousand people a year, you’re hanging out with 1/4th of the human race. You’re getting all the retro viruses from all over the planet. Now it might be that none of those things by themselves is gonna hurt you. But we know that some of them do grow in your immune cells.”
Here, Mullis establishes himself as a promoter of Germ Theory, and then quickly goes back into opposition mode, later in the video, where he admits no one actually has proven that an infection is going on.
Then, at 9:50 he says:
“Cell biology is a bunch of magic half the time…people that say they’re doing quantitative estimations of HIV from cultures are fooling themselves”.
When asked if he thinks HIV is an epidemic, his response:
“The number of cases went up epidemically, exponentially, because the number of tests that were done went up exponentially. How many doctors knew about HIV in 1983? 2. How many know about it in 1985? 500. How many knew in 1986? 40,000.
So that’s where the curve (surge) came from. How much money did we make off of HIV this year? They could’ve plotted that and (the curve) would look the same. We’re making more and more money off it every year. If it’s just caused by needles or it’s just caused by homosexual activity you’re not gonna get a long sustained public outcry and nobody’s gonna wanna spend 6 billion dollars a year.
So the CDC says we’ve got to say it’s heterosexually transmitted. There’s no proof that it’s transmitted at all so why not say it’s heterosexually transmitted too? That made it a plague and the CDC needed one. The CDC hadn’t had a good plague since polio. Their funding was probably gonna be cut back if they didn’t come up with one.
Those guys have got an agenda which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health. The scientists are considered the final arbiters of what is good or bad for the planet, and they haven’t got the slightest idea. Instead of wearing white robes they wear white lab coats. Instead of bringing you the word of God they bring you the word of the EPA or whatever and they don’t have to understand what they are making you do in fact and people fall into this because there is a need in humanity in fact for something like a religion.
Something that makes you feel part of some larger group. When beliefs get tangled up with matters of fact, facts become matters of religion. When somebody gets mad at you for asking them a question at a scientific meeting, when someone says “we’re never gonna have Kary Mullis at the European Union meeting of whatever because he came in here and had the audacity to say AIDS might not be something you get from sex”. I don’t see any evidence for it is all I said. I don’t see any evidence for it.”
Notice how Mullis swings back and forth – a true, tell-tale sign of a controlled opposition disinfo agent of deception.
Mullis’s Greatest Achievement: A Fraudulent Process
His greatest achievement is winning a Nobel prize for inventing a fraudulent PCR process of “amplifying particles” that don’t exist.
That PCR process was eventually used to engulf the entire planet in a paranoid psychotic episode of insanity as part of the COVID Con, that’s what we have to thank Mullis for…
Altermune LLC and the “Immune System” Fraud
From his WikiPedia page, we learn a few more interesting things about this fraudulent character, Kary Mullis.
He founded Altermune LLC in 2010 to pursue new ideas on the “immune system.”
Mullis described the company’s novel technology in a presentation:
It is a method using specific synthetic chemical linkers to divert an immune response from its nominal target to something completely different which you would right now like to be temporarily immune to. Let’s say you just got exposed to a new strain of the flu. You’re already immune to alpha-1,3-galactosyl-galactose bonds. All humans are. Why not divert a fraction of those antibodies to the influenza strain you just picked up? A chemical linker synthesized with an alpha-1,3-gal-gal bond on one end and a DNA aptamer devised to bind specifically to the strain of influenza you have on the other end will link anti-alpha-Gal antibodies to the influenza virus and presto!–you have fooled your immune system into attacking the new virus.
It bears repeating that part of his role was to create confusion and chaos, specifically as it related to the fraud of HIV.
“The guys who were hanging out in the bathhouses of San Francisco had every parasite you could imagine,” he says. “It was a whole way of life that killed a certain percentage of the people who lived it.”
“I don’t actually think it’s a disease.” He says, “There isn’t an epidemic that you can verify.” He says, “It’s not transmitted by sex.” He says, “I don’t really respect the people who call themselves AIDS scientists.” (Source)
So, on the one hand, we have Mullis implying that AIDS was spread by homosexuals infected with parasites, and then on the other hand he says that it’s not a disease or an epidemic and that it’s not transmitted by sex.
What?
More Mullis Claims
In a TED Talk, Mullis describes how the US Government paid $500,000 for Mullis to use this new technology against Anthrax, which worked. The treatment was 100% effective, compared to the previous Anthrax treatment which was 40% effective.
Another proof-of-principle of this technology, re-targeting pre-existing antibodies to the surface of a pathogenic strep bacteria using an alpha-gal modified aptamer (“alphamer”), was published in 2015 in collaboration with scientists at the University of California, San Diego.
Mullis was inspired to fight this particular strep bacteria because it had killed his friend.
The Legal and Patent Controversy
Herchel Smith Intellectual Property lecture: Did Kary Mullis ‘Really’ Invent the Polymerase Chain Reaction
School of Law Podcast
It is a trite point that every patentable invention needs an inventor as claimant, just as every inventor needs an invention to claim possession of. However, it does not follow that objectively identifying them and then linking them together are necessarily straightforward tasks; especially in new fields like biotechnology where the creativity of nature itself provides a helping hand and inherent complexity and unpredictability may obfuscate matters further.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which enables small pieces of DNA to be amplified exponentially, is one of the foundational techniques in molecular biology and a vital research tool. Its (alleged) inventor, Kary Mullis, won a Nobel prize for it and was named as an inventor on the two main patents. Yet, his association with the invention was subject to continued dispute and a controversial court case, which, in the view of some highly qualified critics, resolved nothing. Using PCR as an example, this seminar offers some new interdisciplinary perspectives on the contested nature of attribution and credit in the life sciences, both within and outside patent law. (Source)
The effects of business practices, licensing, and intellectual property on development and dissemination of the polymerase chain reaction: case study
The initial discovery of the polymerase chain reaction technique is attributed to Kary Mullis, a chemist who won the Nobel Prize in 1993 for his work on PCR. Mullis found himself at Cetus in 1979 after studying chemistry at Georgia Institute of Technology, biochemistry at UC Berkeley, and doing post-doctoral work in pharmaceutical chemistry at UC San Francisco. His work at Cetus focused on synthesizing oligonucleotides, short segments of DNA usually less than 20 nucleotide bases in length, for use by other researchers within the company. He became head of the DNA synthesis lab in 1981, and automated the production of oligonucleotides, making the process of DNA synthesis much less laborious. With productivity on the rise, Mullis remembers, “we nucleotide chemists found ourselves successfully underemployed. Laboratory machines, which we loaded and watched, were making almost more oligonucleotides than we had room for in the freezer…in my laboratory at Cetus, there was a fair amount of time available to think and to putter
PCR has earned huge sums of money in royalties for the various rights-holders while also becoming one of the most important research tools in molecular biology. In addition to Kary Mullis’ $10,000 bonus and the $300 million earned by Cetus in selling the PCR patents, it is estimated that Roche has earned upwards of $2 billion in royalties from licensing the technology.
Roche represented an interesting partner for Cetus. The Swiss pharmaceutical giant owned the patent rights to recombinant forms of interleukin 2 (IL-2), the production of which was one of Cetus’s largest revenue sources [17]. Cetus officials were intrigued at the possibility of swapping rights to PCR technology for rights to manufacture and sell IL-2 without worrying about patent infringement suits. After lengthy negotiations, Cetus announced on January 19, 1989 that the two companies had settled on terms of the agreement: Roche would supply $30 million, paid over five years, to fund diagnostic research. Additionally, Roche would pay a significant royalty on the sale of diagnostic products and services that were developed through the partnership. Roche also agreed to purchase one million shares of Cetus stock. Most importantly, Roche granted Cetus the rights to use the IL-2 patents for commercial purposes without fear of lawsuit…Source
Interesting that WikiPedia mentions nothing about the lawsuit.
The Inventorship Lawsuit
Defendants argue that Applera breached its duty of candor before the PTO in addressing inventorship and prior art affecting the patentability of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents. First, defendants claim that Applera knowingly made false statements and failed to disclose material information to the PTO concerning the inventorship of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents in order to deceive the PTO into believing that Dr. Kary Mullis was the sole inventor of the asserted claims of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents, in order to remove from consideration Dr. Mullis’ prior art PCR process patents, when in fact Dr. Mullis was not an inventor of any of the asserted claims in the ‘675 and ‘493 patents.
In particular, defendants argue that Applera did not consult with the originally named inventors during the prosecution of the ‘493 patent, who would have informed Applera that Dr. Mullis had no direct involvement in the development of thermal cyclers, and that Applera failed to inform the PTO that Dr. Mullis never programmed a computer to cycle temperatures. Source
III. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
A. Sole Inventorship of Dr. Mullis
The jury found that defendants failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Dr. Kary B. Mullis was not the sole inventor of claims 17, 33 and 45 of the ‘675 patent and claim 16 of the ‘493 patent. Dr. Mullis invented the polymerase chain reaction process (“PCR”) and related processes that are the subject of U.S. Patent No. 4,683,202 and several other patents. While Dr. Mullis originally was not named as an inventor in the prosecution of the ‘493 and ‘675 patents, (U.S. patent applications serial numbers 833,368 (“‘368 application”) and 899,061 (“‘061 application”)), filed by Cetus in February and August 1986, he was added an inventor in 1990. At that time, during the prosecution of the ‘675 patent, the other co-inventors submitted declarations to the PTO stating:
The error in not joining Kary Mullis as an inventor arose at the time of filing the parent of the subject application on February 25, 1986. At the time of the filing of the patent of this application, it was thought that a general purpose programmable temperature cycler was new.
Accordingly, this is what was originally claimed. The original claims did not recite any subject matter regarding the PCR protocol, and it was not deemed necessary to join Kary Mullis as a joint inventor. The subject matter of the PCR protocol and much of the specification from the Mullis patent U.S. 4,683,202 was included in the subject application for completeness in the description of how to use the invention.
It was discovered on or about December of 1989, that general purpose programmable temperature cyclers were already in the prior art. Soon thereafter, between December, 1989 and February, 1990, Cetus decided to narrow the original broad claims in light of this prior art. Accordingly, the claims were amended in March 1990 to recite the details of the PCR protocol. It then became clear that Kary Mullis had to be joined as a joint inventor since the recitations in the claims regarding the PCR protocol were his conception. Accordingly, the error in not naming Kary Mullis as a joint inventor arose inadvertently and without deceptive intent.
Declaration by Richard Leath in Support of a Petition to Add a Joint Inventor, April 2, 1990 [PTX 24]; see also Declaration of Larry Johnson in Support of Petition to Add a New Joint Inventor, April 2, 1990 [PTX 23] (concurring with statement by Richard Leath and stating that he “obtained the details of the PCR protocol indirectly from Kary Mullis by conversations with John Sninsky and Randy Saiki, both employees of Cetus.”); Declaration of Larry Johnson in Support of Petition to Add a New Joint Inventor, August 23, 1990 PTX 14; Declaration of Kary B. Mullis in Support of Petition to Change Inventorship, April 2, 1990 (concurring with statement by Richard Leath and stating that he “communicated information regarding the PCR protocol indirectly to Larry Johnson and Richard Leath through my communications with Norman Arnheim. This information included the reaction mixture, cycle times and temperatures, the reagents needed, and what a machine to automate the process would have been able to do. This information eventually got to Larry Johnson and Richard Leath, probably through John Sninsky and Randy Saiki who got it from Arnheim.”).
Applera also submitted to the PTO the declaration of John Atwood, who stated that given the criteria Dr. Mullis set forth, “an average instrument engineer, using only his ordinary skills and routine approach, could have put together a system to automate various PCR protocols.” See Declaration of John Atwood, June 3, 1991 [PTX 34].
Based on the evidence on which the jury found that defendants failed to prove that Dr. Mullis was not the sole inventor of the asserted claims of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents, the Court concludes that defendants have not proved the existence of any misrepresentations regarding inventorship.
The declarations presented to the PTO acknowledge the initial failure to name Dr. Mullis as an inventor, explain the reasons for this omission, and explain why Dr. Mullis was believed to be the sole inventor of the asserted claims. The Patent Office thus had before it the relevant information necessary to decide the patentability of the asserted claims of the ‘675 and ‘493 patents, including facts that defendants here use to cast suspicion on Applera’s actions (for example, that Dr. Mullis was not included on the original invention disclosure forms and that Dr. Mullis did not speak directly with the engineers earlier named as inventors). Applera, moreover, acknowledged in its 1995 Amendment to the ‘493 patent application that it understood that one of the originally named inventors on the invention disclosure regarding the “Son of Cycle” machine independently conceived of using a Peltier device in a PCR instrument.
Defendants have also failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Applera intended to deceive the PTO. At best, defendants’ references to deposition testimony of the engineers would indicate that it may have been prudent for Applera to return to the engineers in 1995 to determine whether they would verify Dr. Mullis’ 1995 declaration, which explained in detail for the first time his conception of automation using a metal block and a Peltier device. Such evidence is plainly insufficient to meet defendants’ burden. See, e.g. Specialty Composites, 845 F.2d at 992 (evidence of negligence does not satisfy the intent element). First, Dr. Mullis’ declaration need not be viewed as inconsistent with the omission of his name from the “Son of Cycle” invention disclosure form, because one of the named Cetus inventors may have conceived of using a Peltier device independently from Dr. Mullis and at a later time. Applera made this argument to the PTO during the prosecution of the ‘493 argument, and it is possible to infer that the PTO agreed that there was no inconsistency, as the ‘493 patent issued. While intent can be inferred from indirect evidence, here the record is devoid of evidence that Applera knew of information inconsistent with Dr. Mullis’ claim of inventorship, and intended to deceive the PTO by intentionally failing to disclose this information.
Despite little experience in molecular biology, Mullis worked as a DNA chemist at Cetus for seven years, ultimately serving as head of the DNA synthesis lab under White, then the firm’s director of molecular and biological research; it was there, in 1983, that Mullis invented the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure.
Interesting, to say the least.
Mullis’s Strange Business Ventures
In 1992, Mullis founded a business to sell pieces of jewelry containing the amplified DNA of deceased famous people such as Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe.
Mullis was a member of the USA Science and Engineering Festival’s Advisory Board.[25] In 2014, he was named a distinguished researcher at the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute in Oakland, California.
A concept similar to that of PCR had been described before Mullis’s work. Nobel laureate H. Gobind Khorana and Kjell Kleppe, a Norwegian scientist, authored a paper 17 years earlier describing a process they termed “repair replication” in the Journal of Molecular Biology.[34] Using repair replication, Kleppe duplicated and then quadrupled a small synthetic molecule with the help of two primers and DNA polymerase. The method developed by Mullis used repeated thermal cycling, which allowed the rapid and exponential amplification of large quantities of any desired DNA sequence from an extremely complex template. Later a heat-stable DNA polymerase was incorporated into the process.
Despite having no background or experience in scientifically studying the supernatural whatsoever, Mullis publicly recounted his belief in various paranormal activities and his direct participation in some of them. For example, he asserted that he had witnessed the ghost of his grandfather and had attempted to mutually consume alcoholic drinks with the spirit. He specifically used the term “non-substantial form” to describe his understanding of the occurrence.
Mullis’s Awards: Proof of the Club
Here’s a list of all of the awards Mullis received over the years.
- [60] 1990: William Allan Memorial Award of the American Society of Human Genetics, Preis [61] Biochemische Analytik of the German Society of Clinical Chemistry and Boehringer Mannheim
- 1991: National Biotechnology Award, [62] Gairdner Award, [62] R&D Scientist of the [62] [63] Year, John Scott Award of the City Trusts of Philadelphia [62]
- 1992: California Scientist of the Year Award [64]
- 1992: Robert Koch Prize
- 1993: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Japan Prize, [1] Thomas A. Edison Award [62] [26]
- 1994: Honorary degree of Doctor of Science from the University of South Carolina [65]
- 1994: Golden Plate Award of the American Academy of Achievement
- 1998: Inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame, [66] Ronald H. Brown American [67] Innovator Award
- 2004: Honorary degree in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology from the University of Bologna, [68] Italy
- 2010: Honorary degree of Doctor honoris causa in the field of biological sciences from Masaryk University, Czech Republic
The awards alone tell us that Mullis was indeed part of the club. He served their interests and for that, he was awarded the Nobel Prize. They don’t give these awards to anyone who threatens their agenda and goals. They give them to their own – those who help them achieve their objectives.
The Parenzee Trial: Mullis as a Witness for the Prosecution
If you need another example of Mullis telling lies, then watch this.
But it gets worse. As Twitter user Jamie (@JamieAA_Again) has uncovered, Mullis testified in a court case of an innocent man accused of deliberately infecting 3 women with HIV. We know the man is innocent because there’s no way he could have “infected” anyone with HIV, since there is no such thing as HIV.
Mullis joined the case as an expert witness for the prosecution specifically to counter and rebut the defense’s legitimate witnesses and arguments which argued that the man must be innocent because HIV doesn’t exist. Among those to testify for the defense was Eleni Papadopulous-Eleopulos of the Perth Group.
Mullis was brought in by the prosecution to neutralize her.
In Judge Sulan’s decision he even states that it was Kary’s interjection that made Professor Macdonald change tack from the original “No Virus” pleading from the Perth Group as expert witnesses. FYI the judge found Parenzee guilty and jailed him.
Mullis even doubles down showing his own published paper, which he attaches to the email that in his bizarre fantasy world, AIDS wasn’t caused by HIV (which according to him existed) but other “latent viruses”
I might even take the whole thing a step further and suggest that the entire trial was faked specifically for this purpose, to legitimize HIV but that’s pure speculation on my part.
The O.J. Simpson Trial Connection
Now if all of this isn’t enough for you to discard Mullis, perhaps you should consider that he was also an “expert witness” in the O.J. Simpson trial, to cast doubt on the prosecution’s DNA evidence.
Since we already know that the entire O.J. Simpson trial and story in general was a PsyOp full of actors, I can safely conclude that Mullis was one of those actors and that should hopefully be the nail in his coffin.
ADDENDUM 1
(9/26/23)
Well it seems the Mullis rabbit hole goes deeper than previously thought. After we look at this new information, it becomes even more clear that Mullis was indeed very much deeply embedded in the system and only pretending to be “anti-establishment.”
As mentioned, Mullis founded Altermune in 2010.
Altermune Technologies LLC, a newly formed company focused on the development of novel therapeutics to combat resistant pathogens such as MRSA, C. difficile, pseudomonas, and pandemic influenza.
The company is led by a team of in-house scientists, and a wide network of partnerships, including collaborative research arrangements with a number of universities in the USA and Europe and corporate relationships with companies in oligonucleotide synthesis and aptamer selection, which focused on the development of novel therapeutics to combat resistant pathogens such as MRSA, C. difficile, pseudomonas, and pandemic influenza.
“Novel therapeutics” – presumably that means drugs and/or vaccines, developed to combat invisible, non-existent pathogens.
Altermune eventually became Centauri Therapeutics in 2016. You can view their partners and investors here (Google each of them).
Centauri Therapeutics is an immunotherapy company focused on infectious diseases. Centauri’s approach to treating infectious diseases rests upon proprietary Alphamer® technology. All projects harness a powerful and clinically validated immune mechanism which redirects naturally existing antibodies to treat life-threatening diseases.
From their website:
After watching the video on this page you may start to understand why Mullis could never embrace the full truth about viruses. He had profits to gain, for one, for himself and his bosses. But it goes deeper than that.
Centauri Therapeutics has acquired the Alphamer immuno-therapeutics platform technology for drug discovery and development from Altermune Technologies. The price was not disclosed.
Alphamer technology is based on chemically synthesized molecules redirecting naturally occurring antibodies to selected pathogens to fight infection—what the company calls “programmable immunity.” One end of a molecule binds a cell-surface target on a pathogen using an aptamer, while the other end presents specific epitopes that attach to the circulating antibodies. Source
Next, have a look at Mullis’s patents here.
Specifically, click on the first patent for “Chemically programmable immunity” where you’ll find the following:
Methods of Administration
According to the present invention, a universal immunogen is administered to an individual prior to administration of a corresponding immunity linker A universal immunogen can be administered at any time prior to administration of a corresponding immunity linker and may be administered multiple times prior to administration of a corresponding immunity linker. These multiple administrations may be referred to as “booster” administrations. One method contemplated by the present invention comprises multiple administrations of different universal immunogens. With administrations of different universal immunogens, the repertoire of possible immune linkers is increased.
Read through some of the patents and note that while his company held most of the patents, there are a few others that are held by entities other than Altermune, namely The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force, Roche Molecular Systems, Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Specialty Laboratories, Inc., Xytronyx, Inc., and of course Cetus Corporation.
Roche
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, commonly known as Roche, is a Swiss multinational healthcare company that operates worldwide under two divisions: Pharmaceuticals and Diagnostics. Its holding company, Roche Holding AG, has shares listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange. The company headquarters are located in Basel. Roche is the fifth-largest pharmaceutical company in the world by [5] [6][7] revenue and the leading provider of cancer treatments globally.
The company controls the American biotechnology company Genentech, which is a wholly owned affiliate, and the Japanese biotechnology company Chugai Pharmaceuticals, as well as the United States-based companies Ventana and Foundation Medicine. Roche’s revenues during fiscal year 2020, were 58.32 billion Swiss francs. Descendants of the founding Hoffmann and Oeri families own slightly over half of the bearer shares with voting rights (a pool of family shareholders 45%, and Maja Oeri a further 5% apart), with Swiss pharma firm Novartis owning a further third of its shares until 2021. Roche is one of the few companies increasing their dividend every year, for 2020 as the 34th consecutive year.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche is a full member of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)
PerkinElmer
PerkinElmer, Inc., previously styled Perkin-Elmer, is an American global corporation that was founded in 1937 and originally focused on precision optics. Over the years it went into and out of several different businesses via acquisitions and divestitures; these included defense products, semiconductors, computer systems, and others. By the 21st century, PerkinElmer was focused in the business areas of diagnostics, life science research, food, environmental and industrial testing. Its capabilities include detection, imaging, informatics, and service. It produced analytical instruments, genetic testing and diagnostic tools, medical imaging components, software, instruments, and consumables for multiple end markets. PerkinElmer was part of the S&P 500 Index and operated in 190 countries.
Over its history, twice PerkinElmer has been split in two. In 1999, PerkinElmer merged with EG&G, with the ongoing Analytical Instruments Division of Perkin-Elmer keeping that name, while the life sciences division of the company became the separate PE Corporation. In 2022, a split of PerkinElmer resulted in one part, comprising applied, food and enterprise services businesses, being sold to the private equity firm New Mountain Capital for $2.45 billion and thus no longer being public but kept the PerkinElmer name. The other part, comprising life sciences and diagnostics businesses, remained public but required a new name, which in 2023 was announced as Revvity, Inc.
Here’s one of the machines they manufacture.
Next, read the company’s history. Here’s the first paragraph:
The Perkin-Elmer Corporation is the world’s leading producer of analytical instruments used in military operations, space exploration, and several areas of scientific research. A key contributor to the development of such optical tools as the infrared spectrometer, the spectrophotometer, and laser retroreflectors, the company is also known for its work on NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, an ambitious and ultimately unsuccessful project that has nevertheless provided scientists with some valuable information through space photography. Having undergone a series of restructurings in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the company remains, in the words of CEO Gaynor N. Kelley, a “global, yet compact, coordinated and efficient” provider of instrumentation and technology.
More:
Perkin-Elmer came early to the laser era in 1961. In fact, the whole concept was so new that the unit handling the development was called the Optical “Maser” Department, because when Dr. Theodore Maiman first came out with the beams at Hughes Aircraft in 1960, their name was derived from Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Since light waves, shorter and with higher frequency than microwaves, can be concentrated into narrower beams and operate at higher speed, the technology quickly centered on the optical maser version, that is, light beams. It wasn’t long before “l” for light replaced the “m” and the term became laser. Most of Perkin-Elmer’s laser work in the 1960s was in defense and space applications. One triumph came in 1969 when the Apollo 11 astronauts, their helmet visors protected by a Perkin-Elmer coating, deployed Perkin-Elmer laser retroreflectors on the moon’s surface; shooting beams from earth at these reflectors later permitted extremely accurate distance measurements.
How interesting. Since we know that the bit about Apollo 11 is a lie, what’s really going on here?
Keep all of that optics, semiconductors, etc. stuff in your mind for the future.
Centauri Therapeutics and Its Ties
On the partners and investors page of Centauri Therapeutics, you’ll find Animatrix Partners LLP listed.
Animatrix CEO Stuart Lawson is also Centauri’s CFO. Centauri’s CEO is Mike Westby, who previously held positions at Pfizer and Roche.
Westby also announced the appointment of Clive Dix, Ph.D., as Centauri’s chairman. Dr. Dix was previously co-founder and executive chairman of Convergence Pharmaceuticals, acquired last year by Biogen for up to $675 million, and earlier was founder and CEO of PowderMed, acquired by Pfizer in 2006.
Clive Dix is the director of the Vaccine Taskforce of the United Kingdom.
Funny how that all works out, isn’t it?
Mullis’s Bizarre Article
Next, let’s have a look at this bizarre article that Mullis wrote, promoting his company.
Excerpt:
How can we help our immune system? Altermune has a shot at it.
Give its antibodies, its workhorse molecules, bionic arms, little chemical extensions that allow an old antibody to do new tricks. Altermune, LLC, in collaboration with Ron Cook of Biosearch in Novato, CA, re-directed antibodies whose job used to be binding to something called the alpha-Gal epitope or galactose-alpha-1,3-galactosyl-beta-1,4-N-acetyl glucosamine, to influenza using DNA aptamers attached to the alpha-Gal epitope. These linkers can tightly seize an influenza virion, and turn it over to a hungry human macrophage. The change was accomplished with a drug which can be inhaled. The virus never saw it coming.
What else can we do with this system besides cure the flu? There are bacteria like the famous E. coli out there that have learned how to outwit our cherished antibiotics. We need to deal with them, and resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, that can rot you away in front of your doctors and family in the finest hospitals in America. And no surprise, other resistant bacteria are on the rise. Resistance to antibiotics was already in the world when Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin England in 1929. His advisor, Almroth Wright, predicted antibiotic resistance before it was even noticed experimentally. After all, Fleming had only borrowed penicillin from a mold, which had been using it to kill bacteria for at least a hundred million years. Some bacteria had come up with an antidote, penicillinase, which in 1929 no one knew was coded on a plasmid that could be transferred from bacterium to bacterium as needed. But, it only took about fifty years before the enzyme was transferred to a bacterium with a taste for warm blood.
The story is about the same for all of our antibiotics.
We need to make our own from first principles, new compounds that have never been seen on this planet. The Altermune method, taking advantage of the evolutionary skill of our immune system for killing micro-organisms once their structure has identified them as being enemies, is developing the process of building bionic arms for antibodies, which once the offending microorganism is identified, can grab it. The process already is quick and efficient, and shockingly so for the microbes, who are used to the slow creep of biology, and know nothing of nuclear magnetic resonance or high resolution mass spectroscopy.
Ron Cook was a friend of Mullis. He founded Biosearch Technologies, and allegedly made the first commercially successful machine that “synthesized DNA.”
But we know that’s a lie, as is the majority of this nonsense about “antibodies,” the immune system, the “virus” and all the rest.
Donald Glaser and the Particle Physics Connection
So what do you suppose Mullis and the rest of these folks were really up to? To answer that question, perhaps we need to go back to Cetus Corporation and its founding father, Donald Glaser.
Glaser, a professor emeritus of physics and of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley, won the 1960 Nobel Prize in Physics for inventing the bubble chamber, a device that allowed scientists to track the paths of electrons, protons and other charged particles after collisions, which led to the discovery of whole families of new particles. Initially Glaser made a minute demonstration device, a small glass phial containing a mere 3cl of diethyl ether. This delicate apparatus was able to show the trails left when cosmic rays or particles emitted by a radioactive source passed through. Both the US Atomic Energy Commission and the National Science Foundation refused financial support, regarding his scheme as too speculative. At the meeting of the American Physical Society in Washington in April 1953 he happened to meet Luis Alvarez and was able to describe his research. Alvarez recognizing the importance of Glaser’s idea, helped to bring him to UC Berkeley in 1959. Alvarez’s team developed large versions of Glaser’s device, eventually two meters long, filled with liquid hydrogen, constructed of metal and with glass windows through which trails of subatomic particles could be photographed. The discoveries of particles using this device led Alvarez himself to a Nobel Prize.
I’m not sure any of that is real either, but it’s at least a clue. Whether or not these particle chasers were actually doing these things is another question.
Luis Alvarez is another shady character who is attached to so many lies it’s hard to keep count of them. For example, he told us how the dinosaurs died.
He also won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1968 which is an obvious red flag. His Nobel Lecture is worth a read, just for the laughs. Most notoriously, he can be considered the greatest Nuke Hustler of them all but you may also enjoy reading his paper on Cosmic Rays and Pyramids. Here’s a fun excerpt for you, just to give you an idea of the sorts of shenanigans Alvarez had his hands in:
During World War II, Alvarez joined the newly formed Radiation Laboratory at MIT, where he developed military applications for microwave radar. He worked on several radar projects while there, and is best known for the Ground Controlled Approach (GCA) system, which used a dipole antenna for improved resolution. Even untrained pilots could be guided through a runway landing by ground-based operators using the GCA system. It was still in use in some countries as recently as the 1980s. While testing the GCA in England in the summer of 1943, Alvarez met a young Arthur C. Clarke, then a radar technician with the Royal Air Force, and they struck up a years-long friendship.
And of course there’s the Berkeley Connection as well. Alvarez is all tied up with that.
He allegedly died in 1988. I say allegedly because you can never be too sure with these spooky characters. In any case, you can chase that rabbit if you like, but I don’t want to get too far off track on Alvarez because an entire paper can and may be dedicated to him in the future. The last thing to be aware of is that Alvarez was a member of the JASON advisory group which are well known as “elite” scientific advisors to U.S. military and other agencies.
The main point here is simply to connect some dots, tie these particle chasers together and show that Alvarez, one of the greatest hustlers of them all, is directly connected to Glaser who is directly connected to Mullis.
Loxbridge and the Royal Institution
In October of 2011, “Loxbridge in a $7m joint venture with Dr. Kary Mullis to develop novel therapeutics.” Loxbridge is headquartered at the Royal Institution.
More info on the business holdings of Charles Edward Selkirk Roberts, CEO of Loxbridge, became President of Mullis’s company, Altermune. More context here.
Mullis’s 1968 Physics Paper
Next, let’s have a look at this strange paper that Mullis wrote in 1968. I would say it’s strange for a few reasons. Firstly, Mullis would have been 24 years old when he wrote this. Another thing that’s strange is that it’s a paper about physics and alleged time travel? So what does Mullis, an alleged biochemist, have to do with physics and time travel? Also, read through the entire thing, I’ll post the screenshots below. I’m sure you’ll find it all quite puzzling and entertaining at the same time…
It sounds more like it was written by a mad man on psychedelics than an actual scientist. But Mullis wasn’t even a real scientist at that point, it was only two years after his undergrad. He hadn’t even obtained his PHD yet.
So what on Earth is this all about and why is Nature publishing this crap?
Perhaps Mullis is more of an actual spook than I realized. Given everything we’ve learned about Mullis, his ties, his funding, the elite circles he ran in – it seems to me that Mullis is far more of an insider than anything else which would explain why so many doors opened for him despite his fake “eccentric” character.
While we may not have all the answers, hopefully we can all at least agree that the anti-establishment, rebel persona of Kary Mullis is an act, and that there was a lot more going on behind the scenes with this guy.
The only remaining questions I have are the ones I’ve been asking.
What do you think these “physicists” and faux-particle chasers were really working on, and why would Mullis (a biochemist) be involved in any of that? What was his role? Was he really secretly working on some high energy physics projects? Or is he just an actor, hired to spread propaganda and misdirects? Perhaps a combination of both? I really don’t have the answers, but I’ll keep asking the questions.
ADDENDUM 2
January 13, 2024
At the 16 minute mark of the Google Fireside Chat, Mullis says that he was writing computer programs and that this is how the idea of “repeating PCR several times” came to his mind, similar to repeating code, or a “loop.”
So what the hell was Mullis, a chemist, doing writing computer code?
So now we have an extra layer of mystery added to the Mullis character to go along with the already tall and unbelievable tale of his life and career. Was he writing computer programs while working for Cetus? Was it before or after he was writing physics papers about time travel? Where did he learn how to write code and for what purpose?
This is a red flag. The Mullis story is too sexy and too unbelievable. Let’s remember that we are asked to believe that he was a chemist, first and foremost, and that is what he won the Nobel Prize for (Chemistry).
When it comes to biochemistry, the official story admits that Mullis was basically winging it and yet somehow got published and managed to get through college. Over the years, Mullis then became somewhat of an expert in microbiology and virology? How?
Then we are asked to believe that he’s an “inventor” of sorts (although we’ve learned he didn’t actually invent anything). On top of that, Mullis somehow got a paper published in Nature about physics and theoretical time travel.
Also remember that he was a fictional writer for a while, too. Then he quit doing that to join a medical school in Kansas City so that he could eventually become a biochemist. Then, he left that job to “manage a bakery” for two years. What?
Now we learn that he was programming and writing computer code? For what? When and where did he learn how to do this and why? All of this while establishing himself as an eccentric womanizer who liked to surf and eat a lot of drugs and all of the rest.
It’s bullshit. Every aspect of the Mullis rolling stone tale is written from a storyteller’s perspective, like a Hollywood screenplay.
The LSD drive through the California mountains, creating explosives and building and launching rockets as a child, threatening to bring a gun to Cetus. Fighting with his colleagues. Surfing, boozing, womanizing. Studying astrology and insisting that he had an encounter with an extra-terrestrial fluorescent racoon?
Apparently he took classes in all sorts of subjects such as music, anthropology, math, physics, astrology and sociology, while completely neglecting his microbiology studies.
Mullis’s Nobel Lecture: A Storyteller’s Perspective
Read his Nobel Lecture. In addition to how erratic he is, just note how often he magically “stumbles upon” things, how often he has good luck and good fortune or how he seems to advance or figure things out via “a very fortunate accident.” Generally, notice how everything unfolded masterfully for Mullis and how doors just seemed to always open in his favor, throughout his entire career. It all just seems a little too fantastical.
Just read the whole thing and note how he just casually moves through these stages of his life where he “did medical research” for two years or “learned human biology for the first time.” It’s all fluff and no substance, especially when he talks about his Eureka moment.
As I drove through the mountains that night, the stalks of the California buckeyes heavily in blossom leaned over into the road. The air was moist and cool and filled with their heady aroma…
In Berkeley it drizzles in the winter. Avocados ripen at odd times and the tree in Fred’s front yard was wet and sagging from a load of fruit. I was sagging as I walked out to my little silver Honda Civic, which never failed to start. Neither Fred, empty Becks bottles, nor the sweet smell of the dawn of the age of PCR could replace Jenny. I was lonesome.
** Roll eyes. Groan. Cringe. **
Now we know why that “fictional writer” thing didn’t turn out too well for him, huh?
The Real Inventors: Erlich and Saiki
Three months after his “Eureka moment” in the mountains, Mullis was able to set up his first alleged “successful PCR reaction.” Interestingly enough, neither Nature or Science accepted his Nobel Prize worthy manuscript. He later got it published in Methods in Enzymology.
In the “Eureka Moment” video, Mullis tells us another story about what led him to invent PCR. He said he needed to create a new market for DNA snips but in the Google Fireside Chat it was on how to create more DNA to work with, so Mullis can’t keep his story straight.
As mentioned earlier, Henry Erlich is actually the true so-called inventor of PCR (whatever you conclude PCR actually is). This can be verified by looking at the papers he wrote. You will find that Erlich wrote a lot of papers on PCR and even a book detailing the process and methodology. Erlich is listed as a contributor on no less than 87 papers.
Meanwhile, Mullis is listed on only 14 papers. After the PCR “invention” Erlich wrote almost exclusively about PCR.
Randall ‘Randy’ Keichi Saiki is another character who gets lost in all of this, who likely had a lot more to do with PCR than Mullis. WikiPedia mentions him only in passing. But almost all of the PCR papers have both Erlich and Saiki listed as contributors, usually the main contributor before and after Mullis allegedly “invented” anything.
If Mullis was actually the leading researcher in any of this, there would be more evidence of it. All I see is more evidence of an infiltrator, an actor and a fraud.
The more logical and reasonable conclusion is that Mullis was positioned as a front man and given a deal that would prove to be lucrative enough for him while at the same time protecting the other researchers’ from tarnishing their images and thus allowing them to keep their careers intact and continue working behind the scenes, while maintaining respect in their industry. Mullis wasn’t interested in any of that lab work anyways, so this was a better deal for him, being the thespian that he obviously was…
The Final Verdict on Mullis
The truth about Mullis is that he spent the majority of his career working for Pharma and indeed going to bat for his industry. He owes his entire fame, fortune and notoriety to the Pharma industry. He has taken credit for something he was hardly even involved in, that was used to hoodwink the entire world and prop up the lies of virology, genetics and contagion theory. Everything that Mullis has ever said has been used to cement the lies of DNA, viruses and pathogenic disease.
Until the day he allegedly died, Mullis supported the lie that HIV exists and that pathogenic viruses also exist. He had to support these lies as well as the lies around germ theory in general and DNA / genetics, because the entire PCR process is based on these lies.
So there is no way he could ever admit the truth without revealing himself as a liar and a fraud, and completely invalidating his Nobel Prize.
In his book Dancing Naked in the Mindfields, Mullis writes:
“DNA molecules in our cells are our history.…They are the stuff of which our future will be crafted. All of the organs of all the plants and animals of Earth and organs that have never been in light of the moon or sun, will be ours to explore—to use and adapt to our needs. Ours will be done on Earth as we sail off to the stars in heaven.”
Perhaps his time as a fictional writer actually served him well. In all his grandiosity, it should be clear that Mullis is attempting to solidify the lie of DNA, molecules and indeed the origins of life itself.
The O.J. Simpson Trial: The Final Smoking Gun
The Nobel Prize splattered me a bit, birds and all that. But if the O.J. trial did also, then there, at least, I was not alone.
Among the evidence found at the murder scene were several drops of blood not from the victims. Presumably from the killer. DNA tests conducted by the prosecution indicated they belonged to Mr. Simpson. It placed him at the murder scene. It was the most incriminating evidence against him. The defense lawyers knew that if they couldn’t raise doubts about that, O.J. was in trouble.
Except that the defense lawyers had no intention of casting doubt on DNA fingerprinting in general and there were no real prosecution lawyers at the OJ Simpson trial, they were actors. This has been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt and can be verified by anyone. The entire trial was a fake reality show for public consumption. It was conducted for multiple reasons, the main one being to bring “DNA profiling” into the mainstream. The OJ Simpson trial helped “settle the science” on DNA fingerprinting, once and for all. For example, the publication of multiple books coincided with the trial and there was a mass media push that solidified the alleged infallibility of “DNA forensics” in the minds of the masses.
This is the crux of not only the O.J. Simpson PsyOp but also the Mullis PsyOp.
The People of California versus Orenthal James Simpson combined the celebrity and media circus aspects of popular society to conduct this PsyOp. The celebrity element was particularly effective in that it involved the suspect rather than the victim which was usually the M.O. of previous celebrity death psyops. So this one added a bit of a twist.
There has never been any other trial in history that cuts across as many issues. Sex, gender, fame and the media, public opinion and the jury system, race and violence, law enforcement, entertainment, murder, and most importantly – DNA.
DNA Forensics and the Commercial Rush
It should be noted that the introduction of “DNA methods” into the courtroom by private companies was unique in the history of forensic science. There was a lot of competition in this area and the companies that were competing with each other adopted a “proprietary approach” in the industry. Their desire to keep their products and processes under wraps did not create a favorable environment in which to launch new technology with such vast potential for changing the criminal justice system. Patent challenges, litigation and technology licensing questions became the norm.
The usual methods of testing new scientific methods are publication in journals and peer review. The requirements for standardization and replication in multiple labs as well as evaluation of test performance under exact environmental conditions are imperative in the validation of a forensic test.
But with a fake murder trial involving “private DNA testing companies,” none of these things would occur as the commercial laboratories maintained secrecy while rushing to get a return on their investment and start-up costs. In other words, these initial major private companies were racing against each other to the courtroom in the hopes that they could be victorious against their competitors in the attempt to license their procedures and sell their methods/materials etc. – to as many crime laboratories as they could. So the Simpson trial was an audition, of sorts.
The problem with all of this is that there were no standardized systems in place to ensure quality control, sufficient validation studies, etc. These companies’ labs were essentially run like research labs and were often started by academic scientists, not forensic scientists.
Lifecodes and Cellmark were two early, prominent companies that rushed into the courtrooms for use by prosecutors.
Lifecodes, formerly known as ACTAGEN [1] (Advanced Clinical Testing And Genetics), was a company founded in 1982 that throughout a 10-year period dominated the DNA fingerprinting scene. The company worked closely with prosecutors in order to provide DNA evidence for trials.[2] Through the case of People v. Castro, it was revealed that Lifecodes did not fulfill their own stated standards and had sloppy record keeping.[3] Their failure in maintaining standards, led the National Academy of Sciences to establish a panel which would standardize DNA fingerprinting for judicial affairs.
[1] ACTAGEN was founded in 1982 by Jeffrey Glassberg and two other medical researchers. With the help of National Distillers and Chemicals Corporation, ACTAGEN began to research DNA [4] fingerprinting and managed to patent their own procedure. After ACTAGEN’s successful patenting of their technique, National Distillers and Chemicals Corporation, which owned half of ACTAGEN, changed their name to Quantum Chemical Corporation in 1986. Then they bought the [1] rest of ACTAGEN and renamed it Lifecodes. Founder Jeffrey Glassberg would then continue to work with the company until 1988. At some point later, Lifecodes was acquired by Immucor, to which it still belongs in 2020.
You can read about that Jeffrey Glassberg character on your own time.
Cellmark Ltd is a UK based DNA and forensic testing company with a history of UK and US ownership.
Cellmark was established in 1987 by ICI having licensed the DNA Fingerprinting technology developed by Alec Jeffreys at the University of Leicester and received a Queen’s Award for Technological Achievement in 1990. The company was established to develop and provide specialist DNA testing services and now delivers a range of accredited DNA and forensic services for relationship testing and criminal investigation. Cellmark was the first private paternity testing company in the UK and participated in the consultation process which led to the establishment of the Department of Health’s voluntary code of practice on genetic paternity testing in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The company undertakes DNA paternity testing on behalf of the CSA and provides accredited DNA relationship testing to support immigration and Visa applications.
When ICI demerged in 1993, Cellmark became part of Zeneca and then part of AstraZeneca in 1998. Cellmark was acquired by Orchid BioSciences Inc in 2001. Based in Princeton, New Jersey Orchid BioSciences Inc subsequently changed its name to Orchid Cellmark Inc and operated DNA laboratories in Germantown, Dallas and Nashville, Tennessee. Cellmark was registered in the UK as Orchid Cellmark Ltd in 2005.
In December 2011, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp) completed the acquisition of Orchid Cellmark Inc. In 2015 the company acquired Keith Borer Consultants, based in Durham, who provide forensic defence services through its wholly owned subsidiary, OCM Acquisition Corp.[7] It is now, in the United States, called Cellmark Forensics, Inc.
In 2018 the management team at Orchid Cellmark Ltd acquired the company from LabCorp. The company is now one of the major providers of forensic services to police forces in England and Wales and has laboratories in Abingdon-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, and Chorley, Lancashire.
Sir Alec Jeffreys is another central figure in this grand PsyOp. He is considered to be the ‘father’ of DNA forensics / genetic fingerprinting. Wikipedia tells us that It took him about half-an-hour to figure out the possible scope of all this – after a “eureka moment” he had in his lab, back in 1984. Sound familiar?
The “Aura of Infallibility”
Many cases in real courtrooms were won by the prosecution on the basis of testing and testimony provided by Lifecodes and Cellmark (and others). Are you familiar with any of them? Of course you aren’t, which is why we have the O.J. Simpson trial.
While these two companies were in competition with each other, they often joined forces to promote their “new technology” to the court, the bar, as well as to law enforcement. In that aspect, they worked together and their job was made easier by a corrupt media that wrote numerous stories about the “miracle technology” that caught criminals with such accuracy.
But you can read my DNA Fingerprinting paper to figure out that this technology as applied to criminal cases is a scam.
Corrupt or stupid judges often accepted the assertions of industry witnesses and experts at face value and juries were often impressed and wowed by the details of this technology which they didn’t understand. Since juries are made up of standard, low-IQ apes, it wouldn’t be difficult to pull the wool over their eyes with an elaborate and creative presentation.
In the words of a Massachusetts Supreme Court justice, DNA had acquired an “aura of infallibility.”
Judge Joseph Harris of New York, after sentencing a defendant on a murder and rape charges that hinged on DNA evidence, called it the “single greatest advance in the search for truth since the advent of cross-examination.”
One Florida prosecutor warned attorneys representing guilty clients: “If they print your guy with this stuff, you’re dead. You can’t combat it. There is no defense to it.”
Defense attorney Robert Brower felt that DNA evidence threatened the constitutional right to a fair trial. “In rape cases, when the semen has been matched with the defendant’s and the chance that it came from another person is 33 billion to 1, you don’t need a jury.”
Much to the frustrations of defense attorneys, the new “DNA fingerprinting” technology was changing the criminal justice system and the O.J. Simpson trial was the key event in history that would bring this technology into mainstream awareness. You have to remember that in the early 90s, the idea of “DNA testing” wasn’t as well-known in society as it is today.
Barry Scheck and the Innocence Project
Simpson’s Former Lawyer Is Helping The Wrongfully Accused
By Lindsay Denninger
June 17 2016When the O.J. Simpson trial was captivating audiences way back in 1994, not much was known about DNA testing. Sure, people knew vaguely what it was, but CSI: Crime Scene Investigation wouldn’t premiere for another 6 years (that was how everyone became armchair experts in hair follicle matching).
Who did know about DNA, though, was O.J. Simpson defense attorney Barry Scheck. A sort of smoking gun on Simpson’s team, Scheck, according to CBS News, attacked the LAPD’s methods of evidence collection as well as the prosecution’s forensic case. But where is Barry Scheck today? Bustle reached out to Scheck for comment on what he’s doing now and has not yet received a response.
According to Biography, Scheck got his law degree in 1974, headed for the high-profile cases, and never looked back. He started as a Legal Aid attorney, but when he gained a spot on the staff of New York’s Cardozo School of Law, Scheck could finally spend time on cases that were important to him, such as defending Hedda Nussbaum in 1988. That case made him a notable name in the world of law, but when he was added to the roster of Simpson’s defense team, Scheck became an international name.
During the trial, Scheck meticulously attacked the forensic evidence that prosecutor Marcia Clark was using against Simpson.
So you can see clearly how this was constructed. It was set up to use DNA evidence to acquit O.J. Remember. Marcia Clark isn’t a real lawyer, she’s an actress and this entire thing is a made-for-TV movie for public consumption. It’s also worth noting that Marcia Clarke was married to Gabriel Horowitz for a few years, so there’s another clue for you.
Need more clues? Read this little article she wrote.
Then, read this article (excerpt below):
Scheck later told The Los Angeles Times:
“It was a watershed case, but not in ways that people suspect. We did not challenge the underlying reliability of DNA testing methods; we attacked the way that evidence was gathered and processed. We had 21st century technology and 19th century evidence collection methods.”
Got that? So, while the goal of the fake trial was to acquit O.J. – it was only in the context of further legitimizing and strengthening the reliability of DNA testing methods. In other words, even Simpson’s lawyers were all on board with selling the DNA fingerprinting technology to the public. The acquittal angle just helped other aspects of the PsyOp, like the race war.
Scheck claimed that the LAPD criminalists were gathering different pieces of evidence without changing their gloves, contaminating and mixing samples, according to the same Los Angeles Times article. To today’s police force and jury, that may seem like a shocking mistake, but again, DNA was still a new science in 1994.
According to CBS News, Scheck was among the first lawyers to take difficult, DNA-heavy evidence and present it to jurors. “In the Simpson case, some issues — the mixtures and statistics— seemed complicated at the time,” Scheck told the LA Times, “but the key points about cross-contamination were very straightforward. That’s why it did change the way people [now collect] crime scene evidence.
Scheck already had years of experience with DNA evidence. In 1992, he and Peter Neufeld founded the Innocence Project, a nonprofit devoted to overturning the convictions of wrongly accused men and women, especially on Death Row, using DNA evidence. According to the Innocence Project’s website, 342 people have been exonerated thanks to DNA evidence in the United States since 1989.
While his recognition as a part of the Simpson trial promoted a kind of infamy in the late 1990s, Scheck told The Los Angeles Times that that’s all changed. “When you have the opportunity to be in the public spotlight in America, you’ve got to make good use of that,” Scheck said. “People recognize me now more for the work of the Innocence Project.” And that’s certainly an admirable legacy.
Indeed.
🙂
The DNA “Wars” Are Over
Excerpted from “Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science” (National Institute of Justice, 1996)
Perhaps the most significant advance in criminal investigation since the advent of fingerprint identification is the use of DNA technology to help convict criminals or eliminate persons as suspects. DNA analyses on saliva, skin tissue, blood, hair, and semen can now be reliably used to link criminals to crimes. Increasingly accepted during the past 10 years, DNA technology is now widely used by police, prosecutors, defense counsel, and courts in the United States.
An authoritative study on the forensic uses of DNA,conducted by the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, has noted that:
…the reliability of DNA evidence will permit it to exonerate some people who would have been wrongfully accused or convicted without it.
So, you can see how they attempted to sell this to the public. Rather than highlight what it would actually be used for (to convict people), they marketed it as a tool for justice that would help the “wrongfully accused.”
Enter O.J. Simpson.
Mullis also admits he was paid to sit in the fake courtroom as an expert. That alone isn’t a red flag, as expert witnesses are often paid for their time. But go ahead and read his story about the trial and decide for yourselves how much of it is true. It’s imperative that you first do the research about the O.J. Simpson trial so that you have the full context and understand that event for the PsyOp that it is. That’ll make it easier to spot the lies that Mullis tells about the whole thing. You can search the PDF of his book for keywords like “O.J.,” “Simpson,” “trial,” “court,” and “courtroom.”
The O.J. Trial: A Cast of Characters
The O.J. Simpson trial is the final smoking gun in the Mullis affair (as if all the other red flags weren’t enough). The only remaining question is whether or not you believe that Mullis knew he was walking into a fake courtroom with fake attorneys, actors and a Judge who essentially disappeared after the fake trial and turned into a ghost.
It should also be noted that the O.J. Simpson trial helped to launch CourtTV which eventually became TruTV.
Also, Michael Baden was the medical examiner. He’s another one of these super-human characters who manages to accomplish what it would take 5 men to do in a lifetime. You know, kind of like Mullis.
John Ziegler revealed on his November 21, 2006 KFI radio broadcast that he once had a romantic relationship with Kim Goldman, sister of alleged “murder victim” Ron Goldman, who was a frequent guest on Ziegler’s show, commenting on topics related to O.J. Simpson. Ziegler has links to banking, the military and to spooky Georgetown University. He also has a “degree in Government,” whatever the fuck that means.
Ziegler was born in a U.S. Army post in Heidelberg, Germany,[7] and grew up as the eldest son of a financial manager in the small village of Washington Crossing, Bucks County, Pennsylvania.[8] In 1985, Ziegler graduated from the Catholic Holy Ghost Preparatory School located in Bensalem, Pennsylvania.[9] He then attended Georgetown University, graduating in 1989 with a degree in Government and a minor in Theology and Philosophy.
You’ll often find the Schecks, Glassbergs, Shapiros, Clarks, Zieglers and Goldmans all over these fake, conspiritainment events. Follow the Kim Goldman link and you can see how these creatures have created an industry off of this event and continue to profit, to this day.
It’s not difficult to look at the O.J. Simpson affair and find many red flags, often in the form of attorneys, witnesses and others who went on to have lucrative careers in the media thanks to their participation in this PsyOp.
Peter Weireter is another example of one of these creatures. He was the LAPD SWAT member who allegedly negotiated with O.J. immediately after the infamous low-speed chase. Since then, he has done quite well for himself in Hollywood.
Henry Lee (forensics scientist) is another one of these strange characters. He’s involved in many other suspicious events such as:
- JonBenét Ramsey (no victim in SSDI)
- O.J. Simpson (CourtTV case)
- Laci Peterson (CourtTV case, no victim in SSDI)
- Phil Spector (CourtTV case)
- The post-9/11 forensic investigation
- The Washington, DC sniper shootings (some victims missing from SSDI)
- Reinvestigation of the assassination of John F. Kennedy
- Involved in the early stages of investigation for the missing Orlando toddler, Caylee Anthony.
While Simpson was found not guilty of the double murder in 1995, he was later found liable for wrongful death in a civil case – which requires a much lower standard – and was ordered to pay $33 million to the victim’s families. Judge Linda Lefkowitz presided over that sham of a trial.
O.J. was eventually convicted of robbery, kidnapping, coercion, and conspiracy in a sports memorabilia case and sentenced to up to 33 years in state prison, of course. In that trial, he had a new attorney named Yale Galanter. He first represented O.J. in a road rage trial in October, 2001. He was also Simpson’s attorney for the drug raid case on Simpson’s home in 2001, a misdemeanor boating violation in 2002, a domestic violence call to his residence in 2003, and his writing of a fictional account of the murders of his former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, called If I Did It. You can read all about this Yale Galanter character here.
Obviously, Mullis was a willing participant in this charade. To deny it, is to deny reality.
Among other things, I would describe Mullis as impatient, impulsive, eccentric and outrageous. The perfect “character” for the role he played.
ADDENDUM 3
Are you familiar with the “Institute of Venture Science”??
I would guess most of you have never heard of it – or perhaps you have. Here is their website.
The first thing you’ll note is that their website isn’t even secure. So much for science.
Our mission: accelerating scientific breakthroughs.
IVS nurtures exploration of powerful ideas that challenge fundamental claims of how nature works. It seeks breakthroughs, curating new explorations and rigorously validating their potential.
With IVS, proposed paradigms and prevailing paradigms compete on equal footing.
We fund multiple laboratories to pursue the same unconventional idea. Compatible results obtained by a dozen laboratories cannot be ignored. This means that proposed paradigms and prevailing paradigms can compete on equal footing. When competition is made fair in this manner, the scientifically superior paradigm should prevail. This strategy of producing a critical mass of scientific support for promising ideas can open new pathways toward discovery and understanding of the world in which we live.
Major breakthroughs come around far too infrequently.
It’s been over half a century since DNA was discovered and a century since the discovery of sub-atomic particles. IVS is a “black swan” incubator for open discovery of paradigm changing insights. By managing modest investments in open exploration of ideas that possibly have enormous ramifications for humanity, IVS increases the likelihood of major breakthroughs. These breakthroughs can build entirely new industries and transform existing ones; they can lead to medical and technological breakthroughs; and they can help humankind with the challenge of managing the environment.
Let’s have a look at their so-called “Leadership” team:
…and their “Advisory Panel”:
The Institute for Venture Science is run and endorsed by world-class leaders, including multiple Nobel laureates, Fortune 500 leadership, and some of our most forward thinkers. The IVS brings a unique eye of discernment to select ideas that bear true potential to change our most fundamental understandings of nature. Its process and oversight create paths of possibility. Many incredible ideas never see the light of day— suppressed for reasons other than their merit and potential for impact. The IVS approach will counter this antithesis of science.
In the link above, you can listen to this Gerald Pollack character give his pitch, in which he sells doom about things like “Global Warming” and such. Generally, he’s just asking for money “to make it possible for scientists with innovative ideas to gain some traction…” and of course he uses the standard Flat Earth false equivalency strawman to formulate his arguments.
The IVS affords donors an opportunity to help change the world, and to witness that change during their lifetimes. Our strategy anticipates an outpouring of paradigm-shifting breakthroughs in science, which will provide timely solutions to problems that now threaten our world’s very survival. Your partnering will leave significant and lasting legacies — gifts to mankind that you will be proud to have supported.
We are seeking funds for ramping up our operation. While our long-term goal involves an endowment in the billions, our immediate goal is more modest. One million dollars will allow us to fund promising breakthrough science that has already been extensively vetted. Five million dollars will expand our operations to begin making a difference. Ten million dollars will make us fully operational for the next two years, and well poised to build the IVS into a major world force — of which you can be a part.
A 501 (c)(3) tax-exempt entity has been set up to receive donations.
As an IVS patron, you will enjoy a front-row seat to witness the technologies that inevitably emerge from IVS investments in breakthrough science.
We will happily discuss details of how your donation can be used to help build this important endeavor.
For further information please contact Dr. Gerald Pollack by phone at +1 (206) 708-2458 or email ghp@ivscience.org.
Executive Summary:
The Institute for Venture Science (IVS) invests in the high-risk, high-reward approaches to investigating innovative ideas that show promise of leading to important scientific breakthroughs. Acknowledging the need for scientific breakthroughs, some scientific granting agencies have begun taking measures to increase their portfolios of “transformative” research. Transformative research has the potential to bring radical advances. Current agencies, however, are not set up to deal with the most critical obstacle to realization: the reluctance of the scientific community and other stakeholders to entertain ideas that challenge their long-held views.
Challenges are often perceived as antithetical to the community leaders’ best interests and, hence, few transformative ideas ever ascend to realization in a reasonable time frame, no matter how compelling the case may be.
The IVS Operating Plan overcomes this obstacle. It does so by funding multiple teams of scientists who independently pursue the same unconventional approach to an intractable problem, or the same alternative to an entrenched way of thinking. This strategy builds a critical mass rapidly. Grants are awarded following rigorous review.
The challenger and defenders of the status quo present their arguments to a panel of disinterested scientific observers, who decide whether the challenge is meritorious. The most highly ranked proposals are funded liberally, enabling multiple laboratories to pursue the same challenge theme. In the hoped-for event that independent efforts produce compatible results, this multiplicity creates a critical mass that cannot be ignored; challenge and orthodoxy compete on equal footing and if the challenge prevails, then the result qualifies as a realized breakthrough, which might well lead to a paradigm shift or even a revolution in scientific thinking.
The workings of the Institute are guided by a Board of Directors and run on a day-to-day basis by an Executive Director. The Director reports to the Board, whose Chair in turn reports to Institute donors and partners. Following the current ramp-up period, the Institute intends to operate on a $1B per year budget, drawn from a permanent endowment.
The Institute’s investments in fundamental science are expected to bring multiple, high-level breakthroughs. These scientific breakthroughs will almost certainly lead to new technologies, which should produce a healthy return-on-investment, similar to commercial venture investments except that the return will be enjoyed by all of humanity, in perpetuity.
(Note: Executive Summary revised from a version submitted to President Obama July 2010.)
The BION Institute
One of their affiliate partners (perhaps the ONLY one) is The Bion Institute.
The Institute for Bioelectromagnetics and New Biology – the BION Institute – is a private institute founded in Ljubljana, the capital of Slovenia, in 1990. Since 1992 the BION Institute has been acknowledged as a research organization by the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology. In its history the Institute has been partially supported by this same Ministry and other ministries, but it has also collaborated with industry, private organizations and individuals.
It was and still is mainly devoted to basic and applied research in the field of bioelectromagnetics – the study of interaction between electromagnetic fields and organisms. This research area mostly covers the investigations of influences of (ultra)weak non-ionizing radiation in their various variants on various living beings that are not supposed to have any biological effects from the conventional physical and physiological standpoints.
We are constantly developing and expanding our knowledge, experiences and research methodology. We present the results of our research at international scientific meetings and publish them in peer reviewed scientific journals. In the last time his research area culminated in the research project called “The existence and nature of biological field (the biofield)”.
Besides bioelectromagnetics, the Institute is active also in the area of theoretical biology, where it tries to identify basic laws of the living process that are not only a disguise for physical and chemical laws wrapped in the envelope of Neo-Darwinian selection of the fittest. In other words, at the Institute we try to research and understand life above the molecular level. This level concerns a special state of water – the major component of all organisms and endogenous bioelectromagnetic fields of the organisms. At present we are concerned with the study of the origin of life and the study of special characteristics of water exposed to hydrophilic surfaces.
“Theoretical Biology.” That’s interesting. So we’re back to the water folks, of course. Regular readers in my Telegram would be familiar with these water warlocks as I’ve done a deep dive into many of them in the past.
While combining our knowledge of supramolecular nature of organisms with special features of water, we found means to transfer molecular information from any material or energy (field) source into a colloidal solution. A part of our research is therefore devoted also to the study of the effects of molecular (field) imprints of colloidal and other water solutions (and also other carriers of molecular information) on organisms and water structure (BionEvapo®).
The research into bioelectromagnetics enabled us to lay foundations for a standardization of testing of (ultra)weak radiation. Through years of testing, study and examination, we have developed objective and scientifically measurable procedures for testing products, objects, places, or people, who are supposed to emit a beneficial radiation that as yet escapes standard measuring methods. Initially, we started the testing of such products as well as energy therapists within the borders of Slovenia, however, during the last years we expanded our testing service to other European countries.
The Institute had not only a research role but an high too, as since its beginning it has offered the opportunity to attain MSc or PhD degrees to many young researchers. Up to now, it enabled to successfully finish 13 university diplomas, 7 Master of Science degrees and 12 doctorates; at the moment 2doctorates are in process).
Besides this university level educational role the institute has also an educational program involving complementary and integrative healing.
The Institute cooperates with other scientific initiatives, institutions and their representatives. Our professional leader is involved in the development of the Institute for Venture Science, from Seattle, USA; our team for testing cooperates in a broad international initiative for the research of measurable weak emission effects based in Cybertronica Research center, Stuttgart, Germany.
With testing and certification of various weak emission products we cooperate with: Institute for Frontier Science (IFS) from California.
So, it appears these folks are studying in the fields of subtle energy, Bioelectricity, Electromagnetics, and WATER.
- “molecular imprinting technology”
- “Special beverages”
- “Cosmetic Preparations”
Emerald Gate Foundation
Now, let’s take another step – so I am stepping from the Institute for Venture Science to their Main (or perhaps ONLY) affiliate partner, the BION Institute and next – I am stepping from the BION Institute to their Main Collaborator: Emerald Gate Foundation
Oh yes, I’m sure they’re a “non-profit”
A “non-profit” that wants to “assist with human transformation”
…all from the goodness of their hearts, I suppose.
Let’s see how these folks want to “advance the well-being” of society.
The Emerald Gate mission is to assist with human transformation, individually and socially, solving real world problems with innovative approaches in a practical, applied fashion.
Emerald Gate aims to lead state of the art research (and commercialization, as necessary) of frontier/edge science in an integrated and relational way across consciousness, physics, and biology. The team undertakes systematic, rigorous, and outcomes-focused fundamental and applied research, in a way that explores human consciousness as foundational and integrative to conventional materialist science.
The primary focus is on science and applications arising from the understanding of the mechanisms by which conscious human intention interacts with various forms of subtle energy and biology to promote healing and well-being in biological systems, particularly but not limited to human beings. The initial focus within this area is on subtle energy, the invisible, self-organizing field of influence (energetic field of information) which guides the body’s system/natural systems to balance.
In various traditions it has been called elan vital, prana, qi, chi, vital force, or biofield. It is exhibited through experimental data which today is inexplicable based on the four known forces operating in the physical universe and is most frequently converted to observable via a transducer like a living system.
The purpose is to understand the mechanism of subtle energy, how to measure it, and the variety of practical applications of subtle energy. This purpose is motivated by three fundamental goals:
(1) To rigorously advance and bridge the scientific understanding of the mainstream sciences of physics, biology and medicine with demonstrated alternative forms of healing.
(2) To apply this advancement of scientific understanding to the health and well-being of individuals
(3) To help, as a result, raise our awareness of the true basis and nature of our being within a universe that is demonstrably based on consciousness.
Well if you dig further into these strange creatures, you’ll find even more interesting “Collaborators” such as the Institute of Noetic Sciences (Edgar Mitchell) …
You can look at their “Leadership Team” here, and chase those threads if you like.
Let’s look at some of their projects:
More Water Warlocks.
Igor Jerman and the Water Warlocks
Anyhow, if we take a step back to the BION Institute, we will find that their Leader and Managing Director / “principal research scientist” is this guy, Igor Jerman.
Here he is, giving a presentation entitled:
Background Mechanisms of Molecular Structure Imprinting into Water at the XIV Annual Conference on the Physics, Chemistry, and Biology of Water (Water Conference 2019).
Strange that I didn’t find his name anywhere on the BION Institute’s website, even though he is the Leader of that organization.
Igor Jerman currently works as the scientific and managing leader of the BION Institute. Igor does research in the electromagnetic nature of life, in the biological field biofield), in the problems of measuring of ultra-weak radiation form organisms, in dynamically ordered states of water (UHD research) and in Theoretical Biology. His current project is ‘Existence, nature and significance of biological field (the biofield)’, ‘Study and theoretical as well as empirical research of the state of water exposed to hydrophylic surfaces’ and ‘Common ground of non-chemical transmission and consumption of bio-effective molecular and field information’.
As mentioned, I’ve been digging into these Water Warlocks for some time now. Have a look at some of Igor’s publications. You will find many papers on all things “Nano” and “Water” related sorcery.
Igor spoke at the 2014 Water Conference (and may have spoken in other years) along with familiar characters like Luc Montagnier, Beverly Rubik, …and Gerald Pollack of the Institute for Venture Science.
If you’re not familiar with this Beverly Rubik character, you can dig into her, on your own time – but she’s listed on the Institute for Venture Science’s Leadership Team. She has a Ph.D., Biophysics from University of California, Berkeley and is the President/Founder, Institute for Frontier Science (presumably a spinoff / sub-division)
Internationally renowned for her research on the biofield, the field of energy-with-information of living systems.
Edgar Mitchell of course was a NASA astronaut and the 2nd Freemason (after Buzz Aldrin) and 6th person to Lie about walking on the Moon.
Our premise: at the nexus of inner knowing (noetics) and outer investigation (science), we will discover entirely new ways of being and of doing that uplift humanity and advance thriving for all.
no•et•ic sci•ences: A multidisciplinary field of study that brings objective scientific tools and techniques together with subjective inner knowing to study the nature of reality.
Many rabbit holes for you to follow here, if you choose. Funny that the Men’s Warehouse guy George Zimmer is a Board Member. In any case, I will try to limit my tangents so as to not stray too far away from the starting point which is the Institute for Venture Science run by that peculiar individual, Gerald Pollack.
…and its sub-division, The Institute for Frontier Science, run by this other strange creature, Beverly Rubik.
Harry Jabs, Physicist and Engineer, Co-Principal Investigator
Can you believe they named him “Harry Jabs” ??? – haha!
Anyhow, at this point you may be wondering what this is all about anyways … besides catching these Water Warlocks and their continuous shenanigans
Well, guess who used to be on the “Advisory Panel” of Gerald Pollack’s “Institute for Venture Science” ???
Well, well, … isn’t that interesting? It’s our old friend, the wine-drinking, womanizing, acid-tripping charlatan himself – entangled with the Water Warlocks.
You’ll also find a lot of Slovenians and Ukranians all up in these institutions, Like this Stane fellow or the Igor guy.
Sasha Latypova is also Ukranian, I believe. She’s a story for another time.
More familiar faces including “Stephanie Seneff”, with her spooky M.I.T. connections. Let’s not forget Mullis’s patents.
The Berkeley Connection
As a reminder, Glaser was a Berkeley Boy, so was Alvarez, and so was Mullis.
Glaser came from an accomplished academic lineage. His advisor, Carl Anderson, was the student of Robert Millikan, both Nobel Laureates from Cal Tech. According to Glaser, his students used to wonder who might continue this distinguished tradition. In 1993, Kary Mullis, one of Glaser’s colleagues at Cetus Corp., received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Just two years later in 1995, Martin Perl, another colleague, also received the Nobel Prize in Physics for the discovery of the tau lepton.
We already know about the links between Mullis and Glaser, and this helps explain his bizarre paper on Time Travel.
As another reminder – one of his patents is held by PerkinElmer Inc. – an American global corporation that was founded in 1937 and originally focused on precision optics.
Over the years it went into and out of several different businesses via acquisitions and divestitures; these included defense products, semiconductors, computer systems, and others.
So there’s another clue (optics and semiconductors), but it makes sense that PerkinElmer would scoop up the patent…
…so they could manufacture the PCR machines which include semiconductor components.
The Perkin-Elmer Corporation is the world’s leading producer of analytical instruments used in military operations, space exploration, and several areas of scientific research.
A key contributor to the development of such optical tools as the infrared spectrometer, the spectrophotometer, and laser retroreflectors, the company is also known for its work on NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, an ambitious and ultimately unsuccessful project that has nevertheless provided scientists with some valuable information through space photography.
Having undergone a series of restructurings in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the company remains, in the words of CEO Gaynor N. Kelley, a “global, yet compact, coordinated and efficient” provider of instrumentation and technology.
Perkin-Elmer originated in the early 1930s when a common fascination with astronomy brought together an otherwise unlikely duo: Charles W. Elmer, the head of a firm of court reporters who was already not far from retirement age, and Richard Perkin, a young investment banker who had left Pratt Institute in Brooklyn, New York, after a year of studying chemical engineering to try a Wall Street career.
you can read the whole thing on that link above, but I’ll just skip to the end
While the United States is Perkin-Elmer’s single largest market, it accounts for less than 50 percent of total company business; most of the foreign volume comes from Europe. Kelley is formulating steps to attract more Pacific business, but his basic principle is that the company’s products generally have a worldwide rather than localized market. Consequently, he has instituted a switch from operating by geographical units to organizing around the product on a worldwide basis.
The entire global instrument business has been divided into three major groups: life sciences, organic sciences, and inorganic sciences. At the same time, management of the materials sciences operation was overhauled. The July 1992 year saw recovery with revenues at a postdivestiture high of $911 million and profits of $59 million. In Forbes, Reed Abelson ventured that Perkin-Elmer “seems finally on the right track.”
Nor has Perkin-Elmer’s contraction of its business lines meant abandonment of aggressive search for new opportunities within its chosen fields. A prime example is the company’s growing interest in biotechnology instrumentation. In 1986 Perkin formed a joint venture with biotech specialist Cetus Corp.
Utilizing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique developed by Cetus, the venture produced DNA instrumentation products that can amplify DNA from tiny samples. In December 1991 Cetus was acquired by Chiron Corp. after selling its PCR technology to major drug producer Hoffmann-La Roche. As a result the Perkin-Cetus venture was replaced by a long-term agreement with Hoffmann. In early 1993 Perkin acquired Applied Biosystems, an expert in DNA sequencing and synthesizing systems, which can become the base for Perkin-Elmer’s total biosystems effort. It is in such ways that Perkin-Elmer counts on invigorating its business without straying from its instrument orientation.
Fascinating, isn’t it?
Mullis was at Cetus in 1986, of course. That was only 3 years after he “invented” PCR. He resigned from Cetus in 1986 and then went on to serve as director of molecular biology for Xytronyx, Inc. Not sure why anyone would hire him to be Director of anything, besides “Director of Fraudulent Science.”
Since we know that bit about the Moon at the bottom is a giant Lie, what do you suppose these folks were and are actually working on?
Luis Alvarez and Cosmic Rays
This Month in Physics History
February 6, 1970: Luis Alvarez’s Paper in Science on Cosmic Rays and Pyramids
As established, Mullis has some major overlap with these particle chasers.
This all creates the framework for Mullis’s bizarre paper on Time Travel.
As mentioned before – Loxbridge in $7m joint venture with Dr Kary Mullis to develop novel therapeutics.
What that article doesn’t mention is that Loxbridge is headquartered at the Royal Institution.
More info on the multiple business holdings of CEO of Loxbridge, Charles Edward Selkirk Roberts (who became President of Mullis’s company, Altermune).
Loxbridge has been actively collaborating on the project with Freeno.me coinnovator Riley Ennis, who was selected as one of the ’20 under 20′ by Peter Thiel, PayPal cofounder and early Facebook investor, for his fellowship program. The fellowship aims to mentor and develop young entrepreneurs in building innovative scientific and technical projects, in order to create the defining companies of tomorrow.
The Freeno.me technology has potential for use in treatment monitoring and companion diagnostics, and may eventually be applied through the use of cloud computing and mobile applications (my emphasis). Freeno.me is already in early discussions with interested pharmaceutical companies regarding the use of the platform to enhance clinical trials.
“We are honored by Verizon’s recognition of the Freeno.me technology and plan, and the benefits it may bring to patients through earlier diagnosis of life-threatening conditions in the future, said Charles Roberts, MD, CEO of Loxbridge and cofounder of Freeno.me.
Once we connect more dots, his strange paper perhaps becomes more understandable and important.
Time reversal symmetry in cosmology and the creation of a universe-antiuniverse pair by Salvador J. Robles-Perez
Why was Mullis working closely with high level physicists? His boss at Cetus – Glaser, received plenty of military funding. We have no clue what type of classified R&D they were doing. In my opinion, this goes far, far beyond PCR. That whole PCR stuff was just a fluff cover story to help push their microbiology B.S…but these guys were working on other things.
Cetus and the NASA Lunar Project
The genesis for Cetus,[1] the first biotechnology company, began with Pete Farley[2] who after mustering out of the Navy where he was the ship’s medical and diving doctor aboard a nuclear submarine, enrolled in the Stanford MBA program. Following graduation, he took a job with a venture capital company for an annual salary of $1. His sole intent was to learn that business first hand while making as many contacts among the successful Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and venture capitalists as possible.
Pete’s first attempt at building a company was based on developing a simple thermometer using the behavior of supersaturated liquid under small temperature changes. As a part time practicing emergency clinic doctor while in graduate school, he understood the marketing potential of such a device.
To implement this idea, he sought out the top expert on the behavior of supersaturated liquids; Dr. Donald Glaser, chief of the Virus Laboratory and graduate professor at UC Berkeley.
He had been awarded the Physics Nobel Prize for inventing the bubble chamber, a device used as a high energy atomic particle diagnostic tool based on the behavior of a supersaturated fluid when subjected to small changes in partial pressure. Specifically, under the right conditions, a stream of bubbles will form along the path of a high energy particle passing through the solution.
After studying the thermometer application, Dr. Glaser concluded it was not practical, and recommended it be dropped. Instead he, suggested an idea that originated with Calvin Ward, one of his brighter post-graduate students.
Cal identified a microbiology analog to a well known electrical property: the electrical field strength measured from the edge of a straight charged wire varies linearly with perpendicular distance where as the field propagating from a point source charge varies exponentially with distance.
A similar characteristic exists in microbiology petri dish assays where the distance to the edge of an inhibitor zone on the petri agar indicator lawn measured from a 6 mm pad strip saturated with antibiotic, varies linearly with drug concentration while on the other hand this distance measured from a 6 mm round pad varies exponentially with drug concentration.
Because of this biological phenomena, a technician could indirectly measure drug concentration using a linear strip pad with an accuracy of at least one order of magnitude greater than that possible using a round pad. Cetus was formed and the first round of outside financing obtained in 1971 based on this new approach to implementing biomedical assays.
Drawing from Cal’s observations, they developed a simple device, called the “Cetus Fetus,” to measure indicator lawn inhibitory zone size, and organized a marketing business plan. Pete’s first task was to canvas a representative sampling of the hospital and clinical pathology laboratories in the SF Bay Area. To his astonishment, he discovered that the medical equipment & supplies manufactures were selling their round pad diagnostic supplies and measuring instruments at a loss (i.e., as a “lost leader”) as a marketing ploy to gain access to hospital and clinic staff where other more lucrative products might be marketed.
Despite this discouraging development, his backers urged Pete to go ahead with a third attempt at building a company. It was based on a modified version of Dr. Glaser’s ideas on a NASA Lunar project microbe screening system. To do so, Pete joined with four others to form a partnership and start up a biotechnology enterprise.
The partners were Ron Cape with a doctorate in biology and substantial business experience in his family’s Canadian pharmaceutical company; Mosche Alafi, a venture capitalist with strong finance credentials who shared in starting up the North Face outdoor equipment business; Dr, Donald Glaser, the UC Berkeley graduate department professor in Viral Biology that had been awarded the 1960 Physics Nobel Prize for inventing the bubble chamber; and one of Don’s brighter post-graduate students, Calvin Ward with a doctorate in physics.
Ron Cape and Peter Farley
It was based on a modified version of Dr. Glaser’s ideas on a NASA Lunar project microbe screening system.
Right, sure it was.
With the original investor’s consent, and after the thermometer and assay device ideas proved impractical, the partners redirected there effort from instrumentation to implementing a pharmaceutical system based on a logical extension of a project Dr. Glaser and his Cal Berkeley university graduate students worked on regarding mass screening of microbes that possibly had returned from a NASA lunar probe.
That effort was directed at developing automated methods of doing ordinary bench top microbiology on a massive scale. Several applications came to mind immediately, the most promising of which was pharmaceutical drug producing strain improvement. Don’s NASA system had been conceived to quickly determine whether any toxic microbes had been carried back to earth on returning lunar mission astronaut’s space suits; and to do so before releasing the astronauts from their quarantine trailer.
Toxic microbes … wait for it … on the moon!
Final Conclusion
Of course I could never actually prove it, but I think Cetus was a front company for a military operation and that Mullis and Glaser were working for the military.
Regardless of what the true story actually is, Mullis is far dirtier than I ever could have imagined.
SOURCES AND ADDITIONAL READING
- Original PCR invention Paper.
- Henry A. Erlich papers
- Randall Keichi Saiki papers
- Kary Banks Mullis papers
- PCR book by Henry A. Erlich
Additional Reading
- DNA Fingerprinting: A Closer Look
- The Mullis Mirage by Rod Knoll
- Rod’s bio
- PCR – A Mullis Miracle or Another One of Virology’s Desperate Attempts at Staying Relevant
- PCR and rtPCR Under Critical Review – by Tam
- DNA Discovery, Extraction and Structure. A Critical Review – By Tam
- Jamie Discussing The PCR, Gene Sequencing and Genetics Fraud Article
- Darkside Papers Telegram Channel
- All Darkside Papers