“After destroying capitalism, the proletariat will destroy prostitution.”
“Prostitution is the great misfortune of humanity”.
“Male worker, take care of the female worker!” – Soviet anti-prostitution poster (1923)
This anti-Prostitution poster from the Soviet Union in 1923 shows how truly progressive Marxism is.
When the Americans started the Cold War with Robert Kennans Long Telegram as a strategy of containment for the Soviet Union the idea was to isolate the Soviet Union whilst waging a Hot War across the globe to make the world safe for Global Capitalism and the degeneration of humanity. This involved holocausts all across the globe. From Korea 1950-1953.
To Vietnam.
To the revolting genocide in Indonesia 1965.
Holocaust after holocaust leading to the latest one in Palestine and beginnings of World War 3.
Played in 4k on our phones for everyone to see.

A long list of holocausts by the Anglo-European Empire. The stooges of Empire so brazen and confident in their mass murder that they felt confident to go on TV in the 1990s and say “half a million dead children in Iraq was worth it” as a product of American sanctions on Iraq.
Even to nations that were run by conservatives or social democrats that wanted to raise the wages of their people. They too would find themselves facing American funded, armed and trained death squads to make the Globe safe for Capitalism. Culminating in the biggest human/child trafficking organised crime by the primary Capitalist States we recognise today.
When people look around at modern Liberal Capitalism they see a culture of death and decay and degeneration.
Is it any wonder that the Economist was praising Bonnie Blue – a Middle Class pornographer that goes from town to town to have group sex with masked men?

The Economist,[1] a journal that speaks for the British millionaires.. (Vladimir Lenin, Bourgeois Philanthropists and Revolutionary Social-Democracy)
With the lies that have been heaped upon Actually Existing Socialist States it remains scarcely believable how far humanity has fallen or the State of Britain today. The individualists that rule bourgeois society in culture – as everyone loves “me me me” can scarce say a word against the likes of pornographers like Bonnie Blue.
“It is her right”
“What she does is not my business” etc etc
Only a few generations ago Americans, the land of “Free Speech” (just not anti-war speech: that’ll get you imprisoned in the USA since Eugene Debbs) would jail comedians for using foul language on stage. George Carlin and Lenny Bruce spring to mind. Now we get to hear every foul thing everyone says and our culture is degraded significantly as a result. Which the bourgeoisie are fine with. With degradation of culture goes degradation of respect for human life.
Consider how noble and upright Soviet culture was. From the giant of Maxim Gorky to Socialist Realism. The individualist USA had the CIA finance Jack Pollock to combat Soviet Socialist Realism as their art style. When the means of production are owned by the masses and they firmly control the State the masses demand their art style be real.
To reflect everyday ordinary life because they are confident in the future and want to see the world “warts and all”.
When the bourgeoisie had their revolutions, first in England under Cromwell then on the continent under Napoleon it produced the art style of the renaissance. They wanted to be depicted realistically – “warts and all” confident in the future. As time passed and Capitalism led to shocking hyper exploitation in England in the industrial era they quickly lost confidence in the future. Thomas Malthus became the most express position of the British Bourgeoisie – degrowth worldwide to maintain Britains Capitalist monopolies. British and American Liberals by the time of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 had little to be optimistic or confident in the future.
Retreating from the horrible reality of Capitalism from 1917 onward the artists were too ashamed to depict reality as it was. They retreated into surrealism to escape reality. Where reality is depicted; it is ugly as a deliberate demoralisation on the Working Class. To extinguish any aspirations beyond immediate consumption and gratification.
Only in a revolution of the Mode of Production, ie the destruction of Capitalism, did people have things to look forward to in a socialist society. That is why the CIA put forward Jackson Pollock (as well as numerous other talentless hacks to produce ugliness) whilst the Soviets maintained they would not accept bourgeois degeneration.
Look at the below two pictures.
Which painting represents dignity, uprightness and striving toward a higher culture and produced by a talented artist?
Which one represents ugliness, despair and vulgarity and produced by a talentless hack?
I’ll let you guess which is the Jackson Pollock painting and which was produced in 1930 by the famous Soviet Socialist Realist artist, Alexander Laktionov. Seriously. Just sit for a moment studying the two paintings. Contrast your feelings as you drift from one to the other. One the formal Mascot of the McDonalds empire. The other a famous Soviet painter.
Which strikes you as a civilisation? Which strikes you as “anti-civilisation” which can sum up the art, the novels, the poetry, the films, the TV Shows of the Anglo-European Empire.


In 1923 it was a noble aim to rid Soviet society of prostitution and work toward reforming them into Workers to contribute to society.
In 2026 bourgeois society tells us prostitution is good.
Down with individualism, down with capitalism.
The shame of humanity.
